submitted 9 months ago by HansSlonzok@lemmy.world to c/buildapc@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Now Ryzen 7900X is cheaper than 7900 what is weird. Is it possible to run 7900X undervolted to reach the low power consumption of Ryzen 7900? If yes, is it better to buy this cheaper 7900X or 7900 which has 65W TDP?

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Chev@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Why any of those instead of the 7800x3d?

[-] HansSlonzok@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

why should i take this 78003xd? it takes more power and is slower tgan 7900x.

[-] NIB@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's better for games, better performance. The cache makes a big difference. And has better cache/core distribution than the 7950x3d and 7900x3d, so it has consistently better performance for games.

The 7900 is only better for tasks that can take advantage of the extra cores, which are basically 0 for normal users.

[-] LinusOnLemmyWld@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

spoken like a true gamer

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023

1 points (100.0% liked)

Buildapc

3699 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Lemmenmo@lemmy.world