this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
15 points (77.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40219 readers
1176 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/2452085

This is, of course, assuming that the instance is not hosted on the same network that the device your account is using is accessing it from.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deez@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Side note: if you’re doing it for privacy reasons, I was reading that self hosting for just yourself will allow people to see what communities you subscribe to, based on what communities are visible on your server.

[–] Anafroj@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This. Also, anybody who can identify you as the owner of the host (be it through Whois or through hosting service records) can associate your name to everything posted on that instance, thus profiling you, your tastes and your opinions easily (it's insane the amount of personal information we can leak on social media, even when thinking we're not). Clearly not something to do in countries where you can be harassed or worse for your opinions, and probably best avoided everywhere, if privacy is a concern for you. There is some virtue in being immersed in the masses (that's actually a common anonymisation strategy, from merging streams comes plausible deniability).

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

What is your threat model or goal? It could hide the device you use to connect to the instance, however a lot of actions you do on Lemmy, including all upvotes, are public to other instances.

[–] SGG@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Very loosely it would act as a caching or proxy service from what I understand.

My understanding is that when you subscribe to community "x" on server "y", that your server "z" starts to download all of the content from that community so it can serve it to you locally. I don't know how fast the activitypub protocol would fetch new posts/comments, if it's real-time, or some kind of intermittent pull or push.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

VPNs have multiple effects. Which ones are you asking about?

The common ones that come to mind are:

  • Preventing remote servers from seeing your real IP address
  • Bypassing attempts to block access to popular Lemmy servers, either by network operators or the server itself

It won't do the former because media gets loaded directly from federated servers. It might do the latter.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Your ip will only be visible in the logs of the self hosted instance, if that's what you are asking.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That depends. Media will likely be loaded from elsewhere, as will any external link you click.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

True, it depends what you are doing on the instance.