this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

Rust

5966 readers
18 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

beginner question: What is the advantage of using cmp::Ordering::Less over "<", same for Greater and Equals?

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Here's a good example.

Basically, cmp::Ordering::Less is an enum so a match using it is guaranteed to be exhaustive, whereas you need to be careful when doing an if/else chain that you cover all cases.

[–] luminasapphira@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

I'm guessing you're asking because you got a clippy lint. Using Ordering allows you to match the output therefore only calling partial_ord once, compared to using an if-else chain which might call it several times. In many/most cases this would probably be compiler optimized anyway but this makes it explicit.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

~~What language?~~ (I'm an idiot) If you're referring to Rust, std::cmp::Ordering is an enum and can be used withPartialOrd/Ord to see how two values compare. The comparison operators basically call your partial_ord implementation. If you can use the operators themselves, use them instead of calling partial_ord in most cases.

~~In other languages, I don't know, but I assume in general if you can use the operators, you should (unless you're interested specifically in their ordering, not whether one is only one of greater than, equal to, or less than another).~~