this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
420 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3179 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Visits to piracy websites have increased 12% in the past four years::undefined

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 90 points 9 months ago (3 children)

How much has total web traffic increased in the same time? I feel like the number is meaningless without something to compare it to.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 40 points 9 months ago

I can't think of anything in the last four years that would cause an increase in total web traffic. ~/s~

[–] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 9 months ago

I was curious too and checked the article but skimming it, instead of a total, I found this:

A new analysis from MUSO, a U.K.-based anti-piracy analyst [...]

With the study being done by a clearly biased person/group and that large omission, I think it's fair to assume that the % of total web traffic going to pirates might not have gone up all that much, maybe it even went down.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks for pulling the data

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 80 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

geolocking has zero reason to exist in an interconnected world. it is quite figuratively a crime against humanity, denying access to unfathomable amounts of art and culture because they live across a line on a map

[–] Wodge@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

it is quite literally a crime against humanity

No, it really is not. Grow up.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Bro, it's literally worse than if Hitler and Stalin and Trump had some weird three-way baby.

[–] Wodge@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wasn’t that a character’s name in 1984?

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Stupid takes like that are so ridiculously common on r/piracy and apparently the entirety of Lemmy.

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago

please seed

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's amazing that the industry pushed this so hard. Once users get a taste of piracy they're going to keep coming back for more. It's almost like putting all the content behind extraordinarily specific walled gardens (region locks) was putting short term profit ahead of long term gains. The industry could have been less restrictive if people thought they would have access to their collections forever.

A while back I was watching Mad Men on Amazon and in the middle of season 6 I was asked to pay for the rest. With so many easy to use high-seas services out there anyone can guess what happened next.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The industry is never going to understand. This isn't even the first time their greed and stupidity created a market. Anyone old enough to remember movie rentals? The reason Blockbuster video existed was because the movie industry couldn't figure out what their product was worth. They wanted over 100 bucks (in 80s money) for a VHS movie, because to their mind each watch was the equivalent of a movie ticket. No one paid that ridiculous price of course besides businessmen who then rented those movies to you and me.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

"the more you squeeze, the more sand trickles through your fingers“

The industry doesn't believe in that expression.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's only partly about the money adding up from all these streaming services. The other element is that usenet, a NAS and the *arr apps provide a vastly better experience. I can hear about a movie I'm interested in and grab it straight away, usually up to full BluRay quality or, if it's not released yet it will grab it when it's released. When new TV episodes are available it just grabs them automatically and adds them to my Plex library.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've switched to collecting discs, it feels more viscerally satisfying, like vinyl, plus not having to deal with shitty rips, or ISP tracking (i forgot to turn my VPN on once and they literally suspended my service and made me call and grovel to the guy on the phone), or worrying about drives failing (my biggest fear which seems somewhat inevitable for everyone). having a case and art in your hands feels nicer than clicking on a file. plus used blu rays are very cheap.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I totally get that, I buy physical media too. It’s worth mentioning that I used to torrent but stopped because I share the same concerns.

With Usenet there’s no uploading, just an encrypted connection to a server somewhere that’s hosting the files so I’m not making material available. That’s how you can get in trouble.

My NAS drives are in a RAID config, it’s not bulletproof but if I lose a drive I won’t lose data.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I was happy to pay to access content. Then it changed. First with the content getting worse and the price increases, but then - and this was the straw that broke the camel's back - when Netflix made the no account sharing decision.

I'm a single person household, and I don't watch much TV. I can't justify that shit. "But the lowest tier" - fuck no. I'm not paying for a low bitrate 720p stream with ads.

If they had been just a little less greedy, I'd have happily continued giving them £18/month for literally the rest of my life, but no. They have to chase infinite growth.

I already had a Plex server for films and stuff that weren't available on Netflix, but now I've gone full piracy.

[–] muh_entitlement@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

You give them an inch and they take a mile: this is why we cannot concede! If they want us back, they'll have to put a message in a bottle!

[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Those are rookie numbers, gotta pump them up!

[–] muh_entitlement@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

If more of us pirate, there will be more seeds! For god and country, let us sail together!

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I read that as "Privacy websites" and came here to post "How do we know that then?"

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

There’s probably plenty of overlap between p(ir/riv)acy communities.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

And hilariously, more and more tools that don’t even require browsing the sites exist, just has jackett. Though I suppose that may just be considered a visit in this case.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Sorry, that was me... I've really been waiting for this next crop of movies to come out since all of the strikes.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago

The year of privacy websites on the desktop.

[–] muh_entitlement@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's no surprise that consumers are fed up with corporate greed! Every year, content becomes more expensive, because bigwigs need to increase the share price and appease shareholders. Let the house of cards crumble and seed, seed, seed!

[–] Yoz@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can someone please explain how websites like piratebay pops up even though feds has tried to shut it down

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because the feds have jurisdiction only in a single country out of the roughly 200 that exist, and the pirate bay isn't from that one. Used to be Sweden, no idea where it lives these days.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Nobody knows anymore. It's nowhere and everywhere!