this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
194 points (100.0% liked)

196

17889 readers
43 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The economy is just vibes.

[–] perdido 11 points 2 years ago

Can confirm, my bank account is a major vibe check for me

[–] 00@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Needs a vibe check 🏴

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The Phillips curve is an economic model, named after William Phillips, that predicts a correlation between reduction in unemployment and increased rates of wage rises within an economy.[1]

While there is a short-run tradeoff between unemployment and inflation, it has not been observed in the long run.[5] In 1967 and 1968, Friedman and Phelps asserted that the Phillips curve was only applicable in the short run and that, in the long run, inflationary policies would not decrease unemployment.[2][3][4][6] Friedman then correctly predicted that in the 1973–75 recession, both inflation and unemployment would increase.[6][failed verification] In the 2010s[7] the slope of the Phillips curve appears to have declined and there has been controversy over the usefulness of the Phillips curve in predicting inflation. A 2022 study found that the slope of the Phillips curve is small and was small even during the early 1980s.[8]

Most economists no longer use the Phillips curve in its original form because it was shown to be too simplistic.[16] This can be seen in a cursory analysis of US inflation and unemployment data from 1953–92.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_curve

It would seem economists would agree that the Phillips curve is simply a model and not some oracle of economic forecasting. If you take take simplified economic models out of context and ignore the whole empirical side of economics, then of course you can portray it as pseudoscience. You can portray anything as pseudoscience if you reduce it to its abstract, outdated models devoid of context.

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

People on the internet being mad that inflation is going down to normal levels instead of prices dropping is turning me into the "learn basic economics 🤓" guy and I hate it. Like if you guys are complaining about having crushing student debt, you really don't want deflation.

[–] bottom_text@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Bbbut why döner cost 6€ and not 5€ this is terrible (your student debt has gone down 10%)

[–] aluminiumsandworm@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

some prices are overvalued and probably should drop, but those are mostly asset prices and will make people grouchy when they do

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 12 points 2 years ago

We want to believe that the economy behaves rationally but it relies on human beings which are irrational quite often.

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

The priesthood of capitalism

[–] emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

incredible post, captures the zeitgeist