this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
194 points (100.0% liked)

196

16539 readers
2022 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The economy is just vibes.

[–] perdido 11 points 1 year ago

Can confirm, my bank account is a major vibe check for me

[–] 00@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Needs a vibe check 🏴

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Phillips curve is an economic model, named after William Phillips, that predicts a correlation between reduction in unemployment and increased rates of wage rises within an economy.[1]

While there is a short-run tradeoff between unemployment and inflation, it has not been observed in the long run.[5] In 1967 and 1968, Friedman and Phelps asserted that the Phillips curve was only applicable in the short run and that, in the long run, inflationary policies would not decrease unemployment.[2][3][4][6] Friedman then correctly predicted that in the 1973–75 recession, both inflation and unemployment would increase.[6][failed verification] In the 2010s[7] the slope of the Phillips curve appears to have declined and there has been controversy over the usefulness of the Phillips curve in predicting inflation. A 2022 study found that the slope of the Phillips curve is small and was small even during the early 1980s.[8]

Most economists no longer use the Phillips curve in its original form because it was shown to be too simplistic.[16] This can be seen in a cursory analysis of US inflation and unemployment data from 1953–92.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_curve

It would seem economists would agree that the Phillips curve is simply a model and not some oracle of economic forecasting. If you take take simplified economic models out of context and ignore the whole empirical side of economics, then of course you can portray it as pseudoscience. You can portray anything as pseudoscience if you reduce it to its abstract, outdated models devoid of context.

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People on the internet being mad that inflation is going down to normal levels instead of prices dropping is turning me into the "learn basic economics 🤓" guy and I hate it. Like if you guys are complaining about having crushing student debt, you really don't want deflation.

[–] bottom_text@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Bbbut why döner cost 6€ and not 5€ this is terrible (your student debt has gone down 10%)

[–] aluminiumsandworm@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

some prices are overvalued and probably should drop, but those are mostly asset prices and will make people grouchy when they do

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 12 points 1 year ago

We want to believe that the economy behaves rationally but it relies on human beings which are irrational quite often.

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

The priesthood of capitalism

[–] emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

incredible post, captures the zeitgeist