this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
1088 points (97.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54539 readers
136 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You all remember just a few weeks ago when Sony ripped away a bunch of movies and TV shows people “owned”? This ad is on Amazon. You can’t “own” it on Prime. You can just access it until they lose the license. How can they get away with lying like this?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They didn't cut Amber out, I won't be watching it at any price including free.

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They didn't cut her out, but her role is greatly diminished compared to the first movie. It's really a buddy comedy between Aquaman and Orm where one is almost literally a fish out of water

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Still has her in it though. After what Hollywood did to Johnny based on hearsay and seeing them barely do half that when it was demonstrated that she's a crazy liar, nope.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wait, you mean I don't actually own Jason Momoa now? What about my kingdom, do I still own that? (It's hard to tell, since it's lost.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAWHAHAHAHAHQHAHAHAHAHAHQHQHhahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahah……………..

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›