this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
36 points (100.0% liked)

Science Communication

884 readers
34 users here now

Welcome to c/SciComm @ Mander.xyz!

Science Communication



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



About

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Resources

Outreach:

Networking:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagnumDovetails@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

This is an interesting and well written piece. I do take issue with the author falling short in considering the actual actors that have contributed to climate change. It’s not a conspiracy theory that car (and tire) manufacturers have worked against public transportation infrastructure in the US. It’s not a contentions theory that fossil fuel companies knew they were altering the atmosphere and our political system did nothing.

There are conspiracies, which are distinct from conspiracy theories. Would I be a climate populist for suggesting petrol lobbies are responsible to a degree for climate change? What if I believe that capitalist economic forces have accelerated climate change? Could I be disregarded as a conspiracy theorist?

The article makes predictions that are sound, but a clearer delineation on responsibility is needed.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

That's fucking grim. Especially because it's so grounded.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago