this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
95 points (92.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40347 readers
317 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You have 5 seconds to answer 😃

I'm currently using namecheap to buy cheap domains, I know they are not necessarily cheap in long term, but first year + coupons make them almost free

But now I've got some domains I don't want to just use one year, and it gives pretty much a lot of issues with pricing and privacy

So please, people, share services you use, and tell me whether they are private and/or cheap and/or have all those countless generic domains and not just .com .org .net

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Porkbun is sort of the darling of the self hosting community. I settled on them after doing a huge comparison of prices and features of all the different registrars available to me. Porkbun was by far the best.

[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, why did you use HTTP instead of HTTPS?

[–] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago

Totally unintentional. I'll edit it.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I used to use Google Domains, but then they sold that off to Squarespace.

Now I just use Cloudflare directly lol which also includes their free services, which is quite the value IMO

[–] shadowbert@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

which also includes their free services

Well... their free services remain free regardless of your registrar. Still, I don't really mind supporting them given how useful they have been even in just the free tier.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yea poorly worded, I meant that the free services would kick in directly rather than having to mess with nameservers and crap like I used to do whenever I bought a domain on Google lmao

[–] dept@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 10 months ago

TLD-List is a pretty good resource to compare different registrars for any tld.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Porkbun: probably more private than others.

Cloudflare: less expensive, best in class security, but less privacy obviously

[–] mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

https://www.netcup.eu/ for those who need an English version :p

[–] Baku@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For something cheap, my vote goes to name cheap. Their support was actually better than I expected too. For something private njalla is really good. Not sure what's a good mix of both though, maybe CloudFlare? I know you can move your domain to them, so I presume they also let you register directly through them.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Namecheap is a quality service for sure and I’ve used them myself, but they’re only cheap to buy. They really stick it to you when it’s time to renew.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not really? Their prices are in line with any other registrar.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They aren’t. I have a handful of domains on Namecheap still due to the convenience of their api, and each one is between 15-25% more to renew than popular alternatives like Porkbun, Namesilo, or Cloudflare. Now for a single domain we’re talking a difference of $5-10 a year. So for a single domain, is that price difference a dealbreaker? Probably not. But the more domains you have the more it adds up.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

That's true, hadn't looked in a year or so but they are a bit higher now!

I mostly use CloudFlare registrar since I'm already using them for my job. They don't have first year promo or anything like that, but they sell all domains at cost price and it integrates nicely with their other services. Sadly it does not support .ca domains yet but it does support lots of TLDs.

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
DNS Domain Name Service/System
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
HTTPS HTTP over SSL
IP Internet Protocol
SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption

4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 10 acronyms.

[Thread #465 for this sub, first seen 29th Jan 2024, 21:15] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Namecheap, Namesilo, and Porkbun are the ones that people around here seem to like.

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There’s a vocal handful group of people disliking CloudFlare because of their irrelevant “privacy” concern here — you can absolutely use the registrar without using their CDN features. Also, reality check: with CloudFlare’s market reach, there’s zero chance nothing they do online isn’t already MITM’ed already. Having said that, Cloudflare uses their registrar as loss leader, so they give their wholesale price to end users registering, and as such you’ll have the cheapest price available for the domain extensions they support. You can then just set your DNS without their orange cloud and traffic on your domain aren’t going to flow through their CDN.

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

So they profit from high-profile commercial users to subsidize the free tier (proxy, tunnels) and cheap DNS. What's wrong with that? It's not like we absolutely need those (proxy is nice but you can use vps, tunnels are also offered by ngrok).

[–] floridaman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

there are lots of cheap domain registrar options but if you're looking for a cheap .com I always go for cloudflare, they also offer .org for pretty cheap and many other options as well. The domains other than the common ones are pretty decently priced as well. I migrated all my domains there last year and it's really simple, integrates with their DNS really well and payment is pretty streamlined.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah tbh if I’m already going to be using Cloudflare for DNS, might as well use them for their registrar as well. One fewer entity to trust.

[–] ze11e@lemy.lol 4 points 10 months ago

1984.hosting is a cheap and private cloud provider and domain registrar I've used for years with much success

[–] spader312@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I would stick with namecheap (for now) and pony up for a multi year registration. If in 5 or 10 years they are jacking the price up then you can use another registrars cheap port option to get a discount. I did this recently between godaddy and namecheap. I had one domain left with godaddy that I have owned for over probably a couple of decades at this point and they were seriously jacking the rate up on me, I ported it to namecheap for a massive discount.

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

With Google domains transferring to Squarespace I'll be transferring my one remaining domain with them to something else soon enough.

I already moved all of my other domains over to a local provider I use for work that has treated me well, but this one last google domain address has my self hosted services on it and I was using some features that I didn't want to have to transfer so I kept it with google. I was using their ddns service too but my IP is now sticky (effectively static but can change in some rare circumstances) and it has only changed once in the last 3 years so I think I'll just manually manage the A records if needed until I either go fully static or use a third party ddns provider. I also use email aliasing to use me@mydomain with gmail.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I use Dreamhost, can't speak to the privacy but the rates are pretty good

[–] Trollception@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Honestly the best place to register a domain is http://ww

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago
[–] WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

For self hosting, I've purchased .eu domain for ~24€, for 5 years. Later on it will be 11€/year.

I'll get another domain for similar price and for 5 years. :)

Lithuanian service, so I am not going to mention it. :)

EDIT: typo, 11€ per year instead of month

[–] machinin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

11€/month? Do you mean per year?

[–] WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Ummmm probably, yeah, per year.

[–] EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Idk about cheapness But I've been using dynadot and it seems like a really good balance of cheapness and quality

[–] pizzawithdirt@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Hostinger is pretty cheap I think.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

123cheapdomains.com

load more comments
view more: next ›