this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
411 points (84.3% liked)

Memes

45681 readers
711 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I remember people on reddit misgendering that antiwork mod for the crime of [checks notes] a botched interview on Fox News that didn't even fucking matter.

It was an ugly thing to see all that transphobia out in the open like that.

[–] li10@lemmy.ml 96 points 9 months ago (5 children)

That was a colossal fuck up of an interview though, made the entire anti work community look like a load of stupid freeloaders.

Absolutely no excuse for the misgendering or any harassment, but I still wouldn’t undersell how bad that interview was.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 47 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I’m almost convinced it was deliberate

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was a Fox News interview. If the person who did the interview came off well they wouldn't have bothered airing it. Hell, if the person they interviewed didn't come off the way they did they wouldn't have bothered interviewing them.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I mean I agree Fox News will pick apart anything that they get, that’s just the nature of the beast. But the whole discussion in the antiwork community was that whoever did the interview needed to be prepared for that and give them as little ammunition as possible, while presenting the beliefs of the antiwork/workreform movement.

Instead, one of the users (a mod I think?) took the interview without further input from the community, had dirty clothes in the background, and was an easy target for the Fox News crowd.

Idk, it was really unfortunate, and the movement had started to gain serious momentum. It could’ve been a lightning in a bottle opportunity, and they fucked it up

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

This is what I'm getting at, though. If the interviewee didn't fit the checklist of stereotypes Fox News was looking for, there wouldn't have been an interview aired. It was a hit piece. Fox News went looking for a way to run a segment discrediting a movement, and found one.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

The real mistake was going in Fox News in the first place. Nobody should do an interview on Fox News ever for any reason.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 25 points 9 months ago

It really is hard to understate how bad the interview was, that's what makes the misgendering even worse, there were so many other things to critique...

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was Fox News. Even if had been a stellar interview, they would have made it look bad.

And I don't think it had any actual impact on how people viewed the community in general. It's just people being terminally online and blowing things way out of proportion.

I agree the interview was bad, but it's also one of the most inconsequential parts about it. That's the tiniest most petty reason I've ever seen a community tear itself apart over. It was like a bunch of mindless chickens pecking one to death because they saw a spot of blood. Definitely on brand for reddit though.

[–] li10@lemmy.ml 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It was doomed from the start, and yet they went on anyway.

tbh I think they’d put a bad case forward even if they were given a favorable interview, considering they gave Fox more ammunition than they could ever ask for.

The misgendering and harassment is wrong, but I honestly think it’s right for the anti work community to call out how awful that interview was and distance themselves from it as much as possible. imo it did actively harm the public perception of the movement.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

The anti work community had a lot of idiotic freeloaders who just didn't want to work. After the interview when the sensible people left, it got so much worse.

Work reform was better, and came about as a result of that interview.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

That sub was a joke even before that interview. They banned me for asking someone to explain why an investor shouldn't have all the negotiating power if they are putting up 100% of the capital for a new business. Like I wanted to know how they thought that system should work because I don't see how some random person asking for money has any leverage. I wasn't agreeing with the current state of things.

All I got was a permaban with a childish message from a mod.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You think that interview didn't matter? It basically killed the entire conversation about wage/labor imbalance. And that had zero to do with that mods gender, but with that mods absolute stupidity, regardless of gender

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They were a bunch of liberals, the chances they would ever do anything was well into the negatives.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That shit was blown out of proportions, yeah. Critique is fine and all, but that ended up as straight up harassment. Fuck the people using that as an excuse for their transphobia.

But I actually started chiming in when the mod team doubled down presenting themselves as spokespeople for the movement and, in a case of “cannot possibly be timed worse“, presented some kid as a new mod? Spokesperson? I don’t remember. That whole mess got so stupid I zoned out after a while.

The mods were misfiring for sure, but what made me step away were not the mods -- that could have been addressed over time -- but the users. My reaction to the video and what the mods said was basically, "Oh haha, that was bad!" and I think that's where it ended for me. I had noted issues with the mods prior to that and brought them up, and no one seemed to care at that time -- I even pointed out several times that one of the mods had a stickied post on their profile specifically requesting interviews -- so it's hard for me to believe that the users were acting in good faith. Why did no one seem to care before that interview happened? But everyone got drummed up into an emotional frenzy, and that sort of thing is what tears movements apart -- not one or two bad mods.

I agree the mods shouldn't have positioned themselves as spokespeople, but there were so many other ways it could have been handled without melting down.

[–] endhits@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That interview did irreparable damage to the labor movement in the media.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I... don't think that's the case. Last year was the year of labor wins across the board. Like, I don't understand how to parse what has happened in the world since with this statement. Media, especially corporate owned media, is always going to be somewhat antilabor. One bad interview from one person did not impact labor's perception in any meaningful way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 30p87@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You already noted the problem: >people on reddit

"people" on reddit

spoilerBad joke, I know, sorry I couldn't resist

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The purpose of language is to reveal and convey meaning and thought. Euphemisms and euphemistic language are designed to control how you talk about certain subjects and consequently, how you think about them. People who try to control how you think NEVER have anyone's "best interests" in mind but their own.

Don't let other people tell you how to manage your own head.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago

that sounds super profound but imo makes no sense, what's your point? What is the euphemism in the OP?

[–] doingless@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I love this comment because it can be applied to multiple perspectives on this cultural debate.

[–] erev@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I disagree for one reason.

My uncle was being homophobic and transphobic so I started to misgender him so he could see what its like.

Unsure if he's less bigoted now but he definitely got quite upset and it made the point to everyone else around at least.

[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don’t always misgender. But when I do it’s because the bro got nice tits or the momma looks swole AF.

[–] doingless@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I try to speak respectfully to whoever I speak to and that includes using pronouns they want so getting it wrong is always unintentional. But I'll still always speak to any group of people as "you guys". I use that speaking to my 16 yo daughter and her girl friends. It's just not gendered speech, and I know some disagree but whatever

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I am bothered by this Is there actually more pictures and I'm just a lil dumb

Or are you trolling me

Making me doubt my whole existence lmao

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Trolling. It's just a single picture.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

That guy, who said we could use slurs for good. What happened to him? Last time I checked he was defending a white supremacist terrorist.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Frank Miller Batman is still the best Batman.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Too bad Frank Miller is a terrible person. But yes, TDKR is one of my favorites.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 2 points 9 months ago

That REALLY depends.

Year One? Absolutely.

The Dark Knight Returns? Agree to disagree.

All-Star Batman and Robin? Christ no, it might be the worst.

[–] quams69@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Looks like Batman: The Dark Knight Returns.

[–] PotatoKat@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Aka the super fascist batman story

load more comments
view more: next ›