36
submitted 7 months ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We need to abolish minimum parking requirements. They completely warp which types of housing and business establishments are economical to build.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 22 points 7 months ago

While I agree that cars suck and the amount of parking required for them is terrible, this whole article seems likes an attempt to distract the reader from the real issues, which are weak laws on foreign and corporate investment, limited regulations of the rent market, a tremendous cost of living across the country, and lack of competition in multiple housing related sectors

[-] Evkob@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

I really don't understand why people always specify foreign investment. What difference does it make to me as a tenant if my slumlord has their Canadian citizenship or not?

Housing shouldn't be an investment at all, regardless of the would-be investors' nationality.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago

I also specify corporate investment.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

None of my landlords have been corporations or foreigners, yet they all owned enough housing for 20 families or more.

The system itself is broken and all who abuse of it need to be reigned in, regardless of where they come from or if they hide behind an LLC or not.

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

This is an extremely weak study. It only allowed for one year for prices to correct, and it only affected certain areas of a single city.

It takes far longer than that for the market to correct itself naturally. The only thing that would instantly lower prices is if you required all investors to immediately divest their holdings in that area, and that’s extremely unlikely to happen.

[-] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 5 points 7 months ago

@pennomi @mondoman712 "the market to correct itself naturally" lol

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes, “naturally” is probably a bad term to use there. What I mean is that the effects of a policy like that shouldn’t be expected to come into effect immediately - supply/demand is more of a loose trend over time, not an instant correction.

[-] quafeinum@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It‘s one of those shitposts that tries to deflect the reason to something else again. It’s like they are testing which shitposts attracts the most views.

Remember when foreign students were the culprit? Or when it was plastic straws?

If the article states it as a question the answer is: no you shitpost

You know how many multi family dwellings can fit on the land required than a single family home? A lot. You know what’s the reason for housing shortage? Single family homes

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

Did you even read the article? It isn't about the space the parking takes up, it's the cost of fulfilling parking minimums:

“We had a project in Toronto where for 32 units of seniors’ co-op affordable housing. The old default bylaw said they needed 42 underground parking spaces. So that would have cost that not-for-profit $4 million to create the parking before they created a single unit of affordable housing,” he said.

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
36 points (89.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

9677 readers
6 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS