this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
193 points (94.9% liked)

science

14722 readers
937 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 75 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It’s fucking backward to force little girls into skirts.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They have their pros and cons. I wore a uniform to a public school (Australia) and it definitely meant that I had one less thing to worry about every day: being judged by what I wore. As an adolescent that meant a lot, and getting the freedom to wear whatever as an adult has meant that:

  1. I got to learn what's appropriate before I got that freedom and

  2. I had the maturity to not care what others thought about how I dressed.

[–] Jolan@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I went to a British school and it may have helped against being judged for what you wore but instead people just judge you on everything else like your haircut or the way you speak or the way you act etc. If people want to judge you they will snd what you're wearing won't stop that. Not to add people from poorer backgrounds will have broken/ripped/dirty uniform so it does not help at all.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

I went to a school uniform school (uk). It had its pros and cons but having 5 polo shirts, 2 sweaters, 3 pairs of black trousers (pants), a pair of shoes and a backpack wasn't the craziest ask for a decade of schooling.

[–] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

School uniforms promote a more classless society. In retrospect I definitely would have favored them. Of course they should be unisex.

[–] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Only when the kids' parents can afford the uniforms, which has historically been used to divide the poor from the middle and upper classes.

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Mass-produced, unisex speed suits for everyone!

[–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

“What is a speed suit? Only the perfect habilitant for the science minded man, who knows both comfort and ease and demands them from his clothing. In a speed suit you say to the world: ‘Look out! I know what I’m wearing for the rest of my life!'” — Dr. Venture

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I'm so glad someone got my reference!

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 52 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If uniforms are absolutely necessary make everyone where the same thing. Pants and shorts for all.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Put the "uni" into the "uniform"

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hey! You can't say that word anymore!

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

cancelled

I'm calling your manager!

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

You must be unlucky.

looks at name tag - Manager

[–] msage@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

Yees, very nice!

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is how the schools are here in Arizona. Uniforms, but pants and shorts for all the students. Girls can also wear skirts, but really its just shorts that look like skirts.

[–] poppy@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you were curious, there’s a name for those: skorts! They were very popular when I was a kid.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I love skorts omg. I haven't seen them in years.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

Very common in the kids section of the store, since little girls are just as likely as any other kid to climb over and under things.

[–] poppy@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

I bought some from Target a few years ago!

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The standard child school uniform should be a michelin man costume.

Identity: protected

Safety: ensured

Chefs: embittered

Bullies: confused

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Kilts for everyone

[–] SaintWacko@midwest.social 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What I think is absurd, at least around here, is that schools are allowed to require that students wear a specific uniform, but they're not allowed to require that students have a coat

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Forcing kids to bring coats is weird to me

Maybe it’s different elsewhere, but I was born into a relatively cold+wet climate and moved to San Diego in elementary school. I didn’t bring a coat because it made me hot, I was acclimated to colder weather, and I didn’t want to carry it around.

They refused to let me go outside for recess for weeks because I didn’t bring a coat and refused to wear one from the lost and found. Finally, one day, they sent me to the principal’s office and called my mom in for a chat to discuss my misbehaving.

My mom’s response was, “You called me in from work for THIS?! If he’s not cold, he’s not cold! He has warm clothing at home. He’s capable of deciding whether or not he would be more comfortable with a jacket on. Let him go outside and leave me alone”

[–] SaintWacko@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

See, that makes sense, but the problem here is when it's cold, they don't let the kids go outside at all because some of them may not have coats

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Sounds like they should let the kids choose whether they want to you outside or stay in based on whether or not they feel cold

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 22 points 8 months ago

Clearly, the ability to be outside in appropriate clothing for activities isn’t being mandated. This is where a temperate climate enables ridiculous practices to persist.

All I can think about when I see this image is how in Ontario, the responsible provincial ministry requires all schools and ‘day nurseries’ (read day and after school care) to put the kids out in the yards twice a day unless the weather conditions are severe (Less than -20 or more than +30 Celsius.).

Parents are responsible to send their kids with suitable clothing for the cold. One rarely sees little girls in skirts in schools unless they are wearing tunic dresses over leggings.

In an earlier era, pre 1970s, when skirts were mandatory for girls, that meant switching to pants or snow pants from the skirts 3 times a day to go outside in winter (two breaks and leaving end of day).

[–] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Either this article is poorly researched, the study is scuffed, or both. It isn't the uniform but the type of which that the school enforces. There are plenty of schools with gender neutral uniform policies, heck the one I went to in Aus had 3 options, one of which is sports specific for all genders.

[–] Wilshire@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

The last paragraph

Sarah Hannafin, the head of policy at the school leaders’ union NAHT, said: “Physical activity, PE and sport are an important part of the school day and curriculum for pupils. Schools do much to help ensure all pupils are healthy and physically active and break down barriers to participation, including among girls – and this includes considering the uniform choices available for children.”

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

But but... They need them uniforms! They definitely need to be taught that their identity doesn't matter from a young age. How else would we get a society that obeys authority?

Clothes are inherently classful. Kids should not have to worry about class and what others think of what they wear and whatnot. Therefore, it's totally a good idea to rip away this freedom! In fact, I have an even better idea! Let's make all citizens of the country wear "citizen uniforms"! That way, there would be no class. No one would have to worry about what they would have to wear to work today if that choice didn't exist in the first place! Such a bright idea, no?

It is totally not draconian to tell others what to wear on their body (unless they wear clothing that can cause legitimate harm). Right? RIGHT?

/s

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh god. Getting rid of school uniforms really will be the end.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 8 months ago

School uniforms