this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
175 points (95.8% liked)

Linux

54064 readers
735 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Which one(s) and why?

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maturi0n@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

SUSE -> Mageia -> Ubuntu -> Manjaro -> Mint -> Manjaro. Been on Manjaro for 4 years now.

[–] Mars2k21@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Debian for most of my machines, rock solid and works. I've had 0 problems with Debian on any computer its downloaded on. And I personally don't need very up to date packages.

On my main computer (currently Windows due to hardware compatibility issues on Linux), I've flip flopped between Pop and Fedora depending on how much I need 3D graphics applications.

[–] sibloure@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Fedora Silverblue. Solid like Debian but doesn't break and require reinstall when I tinker around.

[–] wgs@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Crux. Simplest package building system out there, and the core is just out of the way completely, giving you the keys to setup your system just the way you want it.

[–] feef@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Opensuse tw

[–] mfat@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago
[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Debian + Gnome: I don't game and have a limited wifi connection and Debian gives me stability, ease of use and I don't need to run an update more than once a week

[–] brunofin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Windows, then Ubuntu when I started Computer Science, then Linux Mint, and I've been hopping back and forth between both but mostly Mint, then for a while also KDE Neon, then I decided to leave my comfort zone and tried Fedora, and never looked back.

[–] thragtacular@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Nowhere. I install whatever will actually get through the installation process without fucking itself up on the hardware that I'm using.

MOST of the time that ends up being Mint because the developers aren't idiots. SOMETIMES it's Ubuntu. But neither wants to install properly every time, because of course not.

[–] Junkdata@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Windows -> macos -> pop os -> debian -> fedora ↓ Now

  • linux mint(desktop)
  • slackware(laptop)
  • arch linux(Kvm/Qemu for gaming)
  • Netbsd(older hardware/for fun)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] waspentalive@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I am running Debian / KDE with a lot of KDE adjustments/configuration. Debian to ditch snaps, KDE because I can 'adjust' it to my liking.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried a ton, and I settled with Fedora just for the mix of stability and support. Though, with Red Hat being asses I might have to mix it up.

load more comments (1 replies)

Arch Linux (Endeavour OS if you are scared of the terminal) for personal use. It's almost all the software you want one click away, plus the best documentation ever.

Debian on my company's computer because Debian.

[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Way back when I think it was SUSE for me after BeOS went under. Ubuntu, debian, arch, and then nixos maybe 7 or 8 years ago. Back to ubuntu for work for a few years, but nixos full time now.

[–] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

EndeavourOS. Bleeding edge and super easy to use. It's perfect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jmbreuer@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Might be OT since I never was much of a distro hopper.

Got introduced to Linux with SLS, used RedHat until it became too commercial for my taste. At that time, found gentoo and stuck with it hard. It allows me to have completely custom packages fully integrated with the system package manager, that's the top killer feature for me.

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago

I'm probably going to stick with Arch, or maybe EndeavourOS.

I've hopped from distro to distro but I always keep coming back to Arch. The reason I use Arch is that it's my weird sweet spot of "DIY" and "it just works". It gives me a blank slate at first, but it lets me paint the canvas with whatever I want, however I want. It allows for some weird setups (like VFIO, for instance) and the wiki really helps with that. I don't really use the AUR nowadays unless it's for a package only available there, so I can't say anything about that. I use Flatpak nowadays. Some people might prefer the AUR, that's good for them! Right now it's just not for me.

If I do distro-hop again, I'll probably go for EndeavourOS just to have an Arch install that leans heavier on the "just works" side of things.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ubuntu, Arch, Manjaro and now Guix as my hopefully permanent home. Guix is one configuration file, and zap! the system configures itself from that. There are oc a lot of other goodies..

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›