9
Post automatically removed :/ (lemmy.today)
submitted 8 months ago by L4r4@lemmy.today to c/javascript@programming.dev
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi,

For the moderators of this community:

I've just cross-posted one of my post and I got from this bot Automod@programming.dev

your post xxx has been removed as you do not have enough activity on your account to create image posts in that community

Hopefully I saw the message, because I could really have miss it ! is that necessary ?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ategon@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Some trolls post csam which is why this is currently remove everything rather than handle afterwards since I would rather not let our users see csam. If you get a bit of activity in your account that handling goes away and usually ill restore the post a bit after if I see the automod has removed It but looks like you reposted

[-] L4r4@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Thank you @Ategon@programming.dev

It's that so much CSAM[^1] that all posts with a picture need to be censored automatically ? I'm amazed if it's the case.

FYI: in Lemmy, an user can block another user ! (do not see it's bullshit content, and maybe report to admin and authority the content)

I'm not a huge supporter of automatic censorship...

[^1]:Child Sexual Abuse Material

[-] Ategon@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Blocking doesn't help if they just make new accounts each time

And yes there was a lot for awhile and now there's also spam on images from the mastodon side that's been coming in

It's only image posts and its not all posts with a picture, just if the user has basically no posts

[-] L4r4@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago

And yes there was a lot for awhile and now there’s also spam on images from the mastodon side that’s been coming in

I guess there is out there some Lemmy haters :)

It’s only image posts and its not all posts with a picture, just if the user has basically no posts

Hoo ok, that indeed better.

Thanks for the precision.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'd rather not see any child porn then see pictures by relatively inactive users personally. Even one image getting through is too much.

It's also not censoring but moderating. Two very different concepts.

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
9 points (90.9% liked)

JavaScript

1968 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
erlingur@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
nick@programming.dev