this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
79 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

38951 readers
152 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI summary:

The world's first mass-produced humanoid robot was the GR-1, developed by Fourier Intelligence in China[1][2][3]. The robot is 1.64 meters tall and weighs 55 kilograms, and is designed to help tackle labor shortages amid an aging population. It is capable of carrying patients from the bed to wheelchairs and helping to pick up objects[1][2][3][5]. While the GR-1 is often referred to as the world's first mass-produced humanoid robot, it is important to note that it is not the first humanoid robot ever produced. However, it is the first to be mass-produced, meaning that it is produced in large quantities for commercial use[3].

Citations: [1] https://www.euronews.com/video/2023/07/12/worlds-first-mass-produced-humanoid-robot-to-tackle-labour-shortages-amid-ageing-populatio [2] https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/07/12/worlds-first-mass-produced-humanoid-robot-to-tackle-labour-shortages-amid-ageing-populatio [3] https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/fourier-intelligence-gr-1-humanoid-bot/ [4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgo-jF4j8g8 [5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogiAkllCzA4 [6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhOND0JWoGA

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Labour shortages? How about paying a living wage?

[–] Veritas@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The median salary in China is 26,800 Yuan (USD 3,855) per month. ^1

[–] Harrison@ttrpg.network 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's the living wage in China?

[–] Spuddaccino@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

From what I can easily find, it seems to be around 3k-4.8k CNY after taxes, about 3.6k to 5.7k before. This was in 2019, though.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

I mean this is China. This is the one-child policy coming to bite them in the ass.

[–] Hyperi0n@lemmy.film 4 points 2 years ago

Unemployment is at record lows here but there are still huge staff shortages. It's why my government is pushing for bringing in refugees and allowing more foreign workers.

[–] iNeedScissors67@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I've had a job posting up for 3 months in the Midwest USA for a couple of warehouse positions starting at $25 an hour and I'm barely even getting any applicants. We still have a few boomers and GenX in the warehouse but the millennials (like me) and GenZ went to college so they aren't looking for these jobs, at least around here. We're a very small company so the weird thing to me is that this is an easier warehouse than Amazon to work in, by far, and the Amazon hub 10 miles down the road has no problem staffing, even though they only pay $16.00/hr and their benefits sucks ass compared to what we offer. The average warehouse pay in my area for my industry is $18 an hour.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like you need to get better at recruiting!

[–] iNeedScissors67@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, probably. We have posts up on indeed and in the local papers but we're getting nothing worth following up on. And I don't think anyone hires recruiters to track down manual laborers.

[–] Plibbert@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What kind of people are you trying to hire? I mean Amazon will hire anything with a pulse. That may be why they're out staffing you?

[–] iNeedScissors67@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I also would hire anything with a pulse since we can train them on the job, but they can't have a criminal record due to the clients we deal with and some work travel is required. It's also messy work -- fiberglass -- and a lot of people don't want to do that (and I don't blame them lol).

[–] Plibbert@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah there it is yeah that makes sense. Hey at least your doing the right thing offering better pay and benefits. Eventually someone will be willing for the better pay, assuming you offer the appropriate PPE. Hey your user name makes sense now! I love it!

[–] iNeedScissors67@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

My user name is actually a Metal Gear Solid 2 reference lol

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

How about "NO"?

[–] MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

“Labor Shortage”=“no cheap, or near slave- labor”

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Username.... does not check out...

[–] Yewb@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Are these robots going to buy the goods and services?

Seems like full automation creates no consumers.

[–] Matte@feddit.it 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

UBI is an inevitable future. the only question is when, not if. And probably the countries that will be able to create a better law quicker than others will get a decent economic advantage over the conservative ones.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't see it. They're fine with letting people fight over garbage to eat.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah but they need people to have enough money to buy their shit so they can get richer.

[–] Matte@feddit.it 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

so, who’s buying their products once everyone is unoccupied?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Will they need anyone to buy their products at that point? They've already won capitalism and they have multiple mansions, robot slaves, AIs, and automated farming.

[–] cooljacob204@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In "Theory" it would drive down priced and the people buying from these places would have more money to spend elsewhere.

Theory in air quotes because regardless if it work out in the end it still takes away a lot of power from labors.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that will push capitalism to the breaking point. We'll see what happens then, although many very bad scenarios are possible.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

The oligarchs will probably throw a fit and kill us all.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=sgo-jF4j8g8

https://piped.video/watch?v=ogiAkllCzA4

https://piped.video/watch?v=HhOND0JWoGA

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

I'm enjoying the irony of the automatic ai summary to read this for us.

[–] UnhappyCamper@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I'm surprised they only made these guys 5' 4" tall. Seems kind of short. Figure they'd have greater abilities if they made them taller, though maybe they'd fall over easier, I don't know.

[–] nevemsenki@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Well, at least this one doesn't look like Arnold Schwarzenegger... yet.