this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
528 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3766 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Alabama’s supreme court ruling that frozen embryos are ‘children’ is a chilling example of the Republican party’s extremism

In a case centering on wrongful-death claims for frozen embryos that were accidentally destroyed at a fertility clinic, the Alabama supreme court ruled last Friday that frozen embryos are “children” under state law.

As a result, several Alabama in-vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics are ceasing services, afraid to store or destroy any embryos.

The underlying issue is whether government can interfere in the most intimate aspects of people’s lives – not only barring people from obtaining IVF services but also forbidding them from entering into gay marriage, utilizing contraception, having out-of-wedlock births, ending their pregnancies, changing their genders, checking out whatever books they want from the library, and worshipping God in whatever way they wish (or not worshipping at all).

All these private freedoms are under increasing assault from Republican legislators and judges who want to impose their own morality on everyone else. Republicans are increasingly at war with America’s basic separation of church and state.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 85 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Can someone please explain how this is any different from a county imposing Sharia law‽ Pretty sure the right is vehemently against that occuring. Why are their morals different, in the end it's trying to control through religion.

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's exactly the same. But because it's their god it's somehow different, but it's not.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (13 children)

Its the same God, though, isn't it? Just their book?

[–] rdyoung@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

From my understanding of the various religions and offshoots, yes, it is in theory the same God. They also feature the same saints and holy figures across the 3 big ones though in the Quran Jesus is a saint or similar but not our savior or the son of God and God in the same package, etc.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Have you seen the south Park multiparter about the atheist otters?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well you see, Sharia Law is imposed by brown people, so God hates it. Jesus was white, American, and a registered Republican, so God loves the brand of extremist Christian theocracy the GOP will bring upon us.

/s

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Don't forget 2A and supply side

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nice that people are starting to notice, I suppose.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

Better late to the party than a no show I suppose.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 35 points 8 months ago (3 children)

When was the last time people were in doubt about that? Conservatives have been trying to pass laws that affect everyone based on their confused religious moralism for decades. Things like “blue laws” (banning sales of alcohol on Sunday) are connected to Christians trying to impose their religious ideas on people. Or the idea that someone’s testimony or oath can’t be believed if not sworn on a bible.

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago

Did you ever see that one politician who swore up and down that America is a Christian nation because you swear into office on the Bible? Complete deer in headlights look when the interviewer explained that the Bible was an option, not a requirement.

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

Media keeps telling me how moderate Haley is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 34 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The people that want a theocracy want it based on their religion and their interpretation of that religion. This way they can present what they want as what god wants and that gives them complete control over you since you have to obey god.

[–] lonerangers1@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Hail Satan!

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

They should be careful what they wish for. There are estimated to be at least 200 Christian Denominations in the USA and 45,000 globally. If they ever succeeded in making this nation a theocracy, it would be a bloodbath in under a week as each denomination tries to make all the others adhere to their own interpretations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There was a speaker at CPAC who just said that they’re trying to make the US a Christian nation by force, even if it means abandoning democracy.

[–] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Everything someone talks a about a Christian nations, all I can think of is Emo Philips' joke https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANNX_XiuA78

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

Talibangelicals

[–] Arbic@feddit.de 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In a concurring opinion in last week’s Alabama supreme court decision, Alabama’s chief justice, Tom Parker, invoked the prophet Jeremiah, Genesis and the writings of 16th- and 17th-century theologians. “Human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God,” he wrote. “Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory.”

Before joining the court, Parker was a close aide and ally of Roy Moore, the former chief justice of the Alabama supreme court who was twice removed from the job – first for dismissing a federal court order to remove an enormous granite monument of the Ten Commandments he had installed in the state judicial building, and then for ordering state judges to defy the US supreme court’s decision affirming gay marriage.

Excuse me wtf

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How do they square that with supporting the death penalty?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Alabama’s supreme court ruling that frozen embryos are ‘children’ is a chilling example of the Republican party’s extremism

frozen embryos

chilling example

Nice.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

Nah, no one could’ve seen it coming. There’s nothing we can do it, it’s caught everyone completely off guard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They don't just want a theocracy; they're well on their way to making it happen.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

They want a dictatorship. They are just using theocracy as a stepping stone.

[–] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 16 points 8 months ago

American Taliban, or a fascist theocracy. They believe that inequality based on some mythological identity is not just acceptable but morally correct.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

The Republican party ~~wants to turn~~ is actively turning America.into a theocracy

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They're using religion as their path to dictatorship. Really only Catholics were in open opposition to abortion until conservatives made it an evangelical talking point. They found a way to control women and then found the audience to market it to. Now they caught that car and have to find another target for their pack of dogs.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago

Always has been.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Republicans also want to bring back 19th century Company Towns. Then, they will fill them with obedient workers, who they can pay as little as they want and abuse as much as they like.

This is why they overturned Roe vs Wade and they're going after contraception next. They need citizen's to breed.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They need citizen's what to breed?

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Their apostrophes!

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Everything is always doom and gloom and fire and brimstone with Republicans. Apparently that appeals to a lot of people.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Don't worry, I'm sure that theocracy will merely be a road bump to a leftist Utopia.

load more comments
view more: next ›