this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
27 points (62.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4556 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world 70 points 8 months ago (3 children)

"Even if Trump is indicted in one of his legal battles, the polling suggests he could still defeat Biden."

He's already been indicted. 4 times.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Remember how Clinton's emails were a fiasco to some of these people?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they meant "convicted".

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

pretty sure this is a garbage article

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

His supporters absolutely do not care what Democrats call him, what legal issues he's involved in, etc. Democrats need to focus on policy and issues instead of solely attacking Trump. Democrats are not going to change Trump supporters minds. Stop trying to get a few Republicans to move over and start courting the actual Left.

[–] BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't attempting to get anyone to change their mind. Simply pointing out the misstatement in the article.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I understood and was adding to it.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 49 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Polls are polls, but just the fact that there is still any conversation at this point says a lot about the state of the country.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The media is absolutely owned by the wealthy and their sway over the common person is astounding.

From what I've seen (uneducated, informal, observation of recent smaller elections) it seems Republicans are losing ground with their crazy shit from school board seats to municipal/state elections - but this could easily be confirmation bias as I'm not really tracking repuglican scores.

It seems like regardless of what polls say, general America is fed up with the crazy and partially showing up to vote (or less R participating if they can't be assed to vote for a D) in less significant elections these days.

Hopefully it's a blowout democratic win this year and they can finally close the door on this Christian nationalist, Nazi, Gilead, bullshit across as many levels in for gov't as possible.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

We've been engineered to have a short memory and an even shorter attention span. People who would vote for Republicans doubly so. All Republicans have to do is fly silent for a month or two and most transgressions and fouls will be forgiven. Whereas Democrats are still being held responsible for things they didn't do nearly 10 years ago.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It really needs to be emphasized that polls this far out are basically meaningless. This far out, Romney was significantly outpolling Obama, and that was a blowout.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

True, and it's also important to note that these are all polls of registered voters, not likely voters. This means they are much less reliable.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There was an article a while ago about Biden being up 10 in NY and everyone celebrating...

You have to go back to 1988 and Walter Mondale to see a Dem win NY by less than 15. Biden won by 23 last time.

He's not a good candidate, and if we're really stuck with him, he needs to pull his head out of his ass.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It gets sadder and sadder the older I get to see the state of America. The fact that this man ever even had a chance to be president, let alone after everything that has happened during and since his presidency, for him to still be the most popular option. I hate this.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

I thought Bush elected for a 2nd term had to be the all time low. Trump winning once, and competing twice for a 2nd term, together with the general insanity Republicans have devolved to, while maintaining about half the populous support, makes it pretty hard to be an optimist about USA.
I know Russia has a hand in this, but turning Republicans to a Putin/Russia loving party, should not have been possible.
Trump is a traitor to ~~his country~~ USA, how the fuck can he achieve nomination even once?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

As noted previously, national polls are useless because we don't have national elections.

BUT - If you look at polling in the states that WILL matter... states that Biden won in 2020 and HAS to win in 2024:

Arizona - Trump +3 to +6
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

Georgia - Trump +6 to +9
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

Michigan - Tie to Trump +2/+3
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

Nevada - Trump +6 to +10
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

New Mexico - Biden +8 - Last poll is so old as to be useless though.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/new-mexico/

Pennsylvania - Trump +2 to +5
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/

Wisconsin - Trump +3 to +4
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

Plotted on a map, that's a Trump win:

[–] poprocks@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is terrifying and needs to get more attention

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

That's why I started following it and am continuing to follow it.

When I started, these states were 1/2 Biden 1/2 Trump, then they waffled back and forth, now they're full Trump.

Granted, Biden hasn't REALLY started campaigning, when Trump has been doing nothing but campaign... that might change when things get serious following the nominations in July and August.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

clickbait article, quoting the poll and the juiciest numbers they could dig out of them.

This survey was conducted online within the United States from February 21-22 among 2,022 registered voters by The Harris Poll and HarrisX

Well what the fuck does that mean, conducted online? On AOL? PornHub? Did you spam people to click a link for your website? Facebook? It was facebook wasn't it. They don't say. FFS was it Xitter? Unknown. Here's the actual poll, which the bullshit article doesn't even bother to link to.

There are SIXTY EIGHT questions. Okay, I want you to sit down and go to my facebook page and answer sixty eight questions. Who does that? I doubt anyone here. 2000 people is at least more than 1000 that they usually use to barf up a headline, but, again, that's 0.00014% of the registered voters.

Results were weighted for age within gender, region, race/ethnicity, marital status, household size, income, employment, education, political party, and political ideology where necessary to align them with their actual proportions in the population.

Well, what were those numbers? It doesn't say. Were they current, as in, 2022-or-more-recent breakdowns? Dunno. Could be from 2006? Maybe.

Garbage.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The fuck are they doing including Elon Musk in "political figures"?

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Giving themselves away shh

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The actual poll:

https://harvardharrispoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/HHP_Feb2024_KeyResults.pdf

It’s worth nothing that voters were also asked about 3rd party candidates, and Kennedy got a big chunk of the votes.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

And they included Elon Musk as a "political figure". WTF?

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The Hill has become complete fucking garbage.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They're reporting on a poll. How is that trash?

[–] banichan@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only poll that matters is the one everyone votes on.

[–] Deello@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

Did you hear that Republicans? You guys got this election in the bag. Don't bother going out to vote because you are guaranteed to win. All these polls keep coming out that Trump is in the lead so just let democracy do it's thing.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 11 points 8 months ago

We polled 75% Trump supporters and our poll shows Trump with a 6 point lead...

[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Bad propaganda it's still propaganda..

[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

These pollsters think they're Lucy with a football and we're all Charlie Brown. They were wrong in 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, but surely this time they'll be able to predict the election.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pollsters generally try to be as accurate as possible but probability is probability and with rare events like this we can expect to see a lot of nonconforming results.

[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 1 points 8 months ago

Which is precisely why sensational headlines about a single poll is click bait I'm ignoring.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


And if he’s convicted of crimes related to his handling of classified presidential documents, voters are split 50-50 on who to vote for.

Trump has long framed his courtroom battles as political attacks, and the messaging appears to be resonating with voters as he continues to lead the Republican presidential field.

Nearly 6 in 10 voters in the poll said they think Democrats are engaged in “lawfare,” or “using the government and legal system in biased ways to take out a political opponent.”

The same percentage said they thought Trump’s legal cases make it impossible for him to be a viable candidate.

Voters were split 50-50 on whether the former president has committed crimes for which he’ll be convicted — as well as on whether Trump is a “threat to democracy” if he wins a second term in the Oval Office.

It is a collaboration of the Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University and the Harris Poll.


The original article contains 377 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Seraph@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

You can make a poll say whatever you want if you have no interest in the truth.

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago

A Harvard CAPS-Harris poll

Mark Penn's fake poll.