this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
165 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2674 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 119 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Can't wait for them to explain how states don't have rights.

[–] frefi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 8 months ago

Shamelessness is the conservatives' superpower

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 23 points 8 months ago (5 children)

They don't owe Trump anything at this point. They have their lifetime appointments.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 58 points 8 months ago

Clarence Thomas is a good example of how effective bribes can still be.

[–] driving_crooner 21 points 8 months ago

They still have a lifetime of vacations and other perks to work for.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago

I honestly think they have skeletons and those "sins" would be leaked by Russia if they don't rule as they are told

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

unless trump gets in again as im sure he wants to be able to pull them out as he feels like it.

[–] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

He can't remove people from the Supreme Court.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

all he thinks he needs to do whatever tf he wants is his sharpie and a change-of-address to 1600 penn av nw.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

there are a lot of things we though presidents could not do till trump. turns out often you can do what you want if you have some zealots to back you up.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

presidential election doesnt just affect their state.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago
[–] TarantulaFudge@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Let's hope they are smart enough not to test the resolve of a real democracy.

The USA isn't a real democracy.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The SCotUS is now invalid & all future rulings by them should be ignored until they are cleaned out & replaced.

If the states ignored this ruling, SCotUS can't do a damn thing about it. We don't re-run elections.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

I said on mastodon that the correct decisions is who the states put on the ballot is up to them. However states do not elective a president, they send electors. The electors will not be allowed to choose Trump when they meet. Ideally this comes with a reminder that no law or contract may bind who an elector votes for when they meet. This would give the electors a lot more power which I think is a good thing (and also the whole point of them in the first place).

The election might go to the house of representatives of course.