F-Droid

8114 readers

28 users here now

F-Droid is an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) applications for the Android platform. The client makes it easy to browse, install, and keep track of updates on your device.

Website | GitLab | Mastodon

Matrix space | forum | IRC

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

fossdd@lemmy.ml

testman@lemmy.ml

3rd party Telegram app? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 8 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/fdroid@lemmy.ml

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The official Telegram app with ads that appear at inconvenient locations bugs me. Any recomendations for a good FOSS Telegram client that does not show ads?

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] David@lemy.lol 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm using Mercurygram because it supports UnifiedPush

[–] Sentient@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've been using Telegram-FOSS

Unsure if it does (not) have ads though,
if it has, then they're likely blocked by Adaway

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 months ago

I didn’t notice any apps yet and I definitely don’t use any kind of ad blocking.

[–] gunpachi@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Extergaram is pretty good. I have been using it for about 4 months now. I feel like this is the best fork I've tried.

Previously I have tried Nekogram X and for a very short while Forkgram

[–] doors_3@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Does Telegram actively enforce stuff against third party clients? Like if I use a third party client, is my account at risk of being banned?

[–] gunpachi@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think so. As long as you are not in some shady third party fork, you will be okay.

I have been using telegram forks for some time now, never encountered a ban or anything like that.

[–] doors_3@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I was just piqued that if third party forks might offer extra features, some of which if they overlap with Telegram's Premium offering, could be an issue. But I checked out couple of apps listed in this thread and they feel alright. I had confused a fork with a mod of the official app, the latter of which would certainly be a grey area.

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Nah they they're chill. Hell, I can't even count how many alternative clients they own. IIRC they developed four clients for web alone.

[–] RedBauble@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nekogram X?

[–] schizoidman@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Seems some messages in channels are not supported.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nekogram

[–] The_wild_card@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would suggest Mercurygram or telegram FOSS both removes binary bloat . The dev of mercurygram is super responsive and the updates are also faster on mercurygram .

[–] schizoidman@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Mercurygram still has ads unfortunately

[–] The_wild_card@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

What i have never ever seen em. I think it maybe the channels you are in ?

[–] stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 8 months ago

Telegrapher looks cool

[–] pixelgesicht@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

matrix with telegram bridge

[–] Sentient@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

One of the clients of all time