this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
372 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59609 readers
3606 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Legislation is Way overdue for this nonsense. My home security cameras are all being disabled and unable to record videos as they have for years because the company (fuck you Arlo) has decided they want users to just suddenly start paying subscription fees. If we let them every company will eventually move to this model. Even staunch capitalists need to recognize that this is an issue begging for legislation. Stop this insanity.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Thats absolutely outrageous. Thats a brand I'll never be purchasing.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Legislation is the only way to reign it in, of course they'd scream "but prices would go up!". I'd rather pay a few bucks more up front to not pay 10x as much in ink later. The whole subscription model is awful too. They are turning our whole lives into rentals.

I'm sure if they did legislate it they'd do everything they could to try to work around it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

It needs to be eWaste prevention law. Perfectly functioning hardware should never become a brick due to license/subscription. Period. I don't care if your business model is based on it. Fuck you.

[–] jaamesbaxterr@lemmy.ninja 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm in the same boat as you with the Arlo cameras. I've got the Pro (4030) cameras. I read an article that said they kinda walked that decision back. They are going to continue the 7 day free cloud storage, so after the EOL date, which was July 1st, they'll continue to offer security updates for a year, but after that our cameras will still work but not receive updates. I'll definitely be looking for other options, but at least they'll still work. If anyone knows a good kit that lets you host the videos yourself I'd be interested in hearing about it.

[–] beregoth@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Security updates should be mandatory. Something like safety recalls on a vehicle.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I just purchased my first Lorex camera. Won't likely have time to tinker with it for another week or so, but can let you know if it seems good. Hoping to switch to their entire local infrastructure.

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My home camera was exactly what prompt me to learn how to reflash IoT devices, and set up a Home Assistant network that's entierly self-hosted. It's way easier than I though.

[–] IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Want to drop some links for where to get started? I only sort of understand what you just said but I like the idea of my own network and it being easier than it seems!

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That's why I never cry for Adobe when they get pirated.

[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's shenanigans like this that make me never want to buy a Canon or HP product. If I need a high end inkjet for printing photographs, it's Epson all day. For anything else, I swear by a good used bulletproof Brother.

[–] Maraval26@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Brother was good but I’m disappointed by the last units I had. After 4 years of light home usage (one page here and there), they are not picking up paper in the tray. Same for some relatives which bought similar units. Feels like scheduled obsolescence …

[–] teft@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The printer might just need a maintenance kit done to it. Those rollers are meant to wear out over time.

[–] czech@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is surprising they'd stop working after only occasional use. The rollers on my scanner are good for 30k scans.

[–] GizmoLion@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You say "occasional use", I read "given time for dust to collect".

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It's this. All the printers at my office started screwing up in 2022 after barely any usage from 2020-2022.

[–] teft@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Like WagesOf said below, the rollers wear out over time and use. So even if you don't use them they do eventually just wear out.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Or even just cleaning from dust, maybe even spider webs.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

If it's just that, then the rubber on the rollers had probably dried out. I had the same issue with a 10 year old HP inkjet. Some mg chemicals "rubber renue" worked great.

[–] burrito@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Sometimes a good cleaning of the rollers with rubbing alcohol will bring it back.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RockyC@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve been doing IT for over 25 years. The only printer brand I will buy or recommend for the past 15 years running is Brother.

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brother has pulled this shit on my laser, locking out a non genuine cartridge after an update

Be warned they are all pieces of shit

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

My recommendation is to not buy cheap and look into small or medium printer class printers (depending on the volume).
Never the consumer version if possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MisterChief@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For anyone in the market for a printer: brother.

[–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Got an epson with an ecotank and quite happy with it.

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

And go for laserjet.

[–] burrito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

My last three printers have been Brother and they have been great. They do still have chipped toner cartridges but I haven't had any trouble with 3rd party toner. They also work fantastic on Linux.

[–] typfelhyaene@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ink jet printers really are the embodiment of peak capitalism.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't wait until a company like Apple creates their own printers and somehow makes it worse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 18 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Were you hoping Canon might be held accountable for its all-in-one printers that mysteriously can’t scan when they’re low on ink, forcing you to buy more?

I just checked, and a judge already dismissed David Leacraft’s lawsuit in November, without Canon ever being forced to show what happens when you try to scan without a full ink cartridge.

Here’s the good news: HP, an even larger and more shameless manufacturer of printers, is still possibly facing down a class-action suit for the same practice.

Interestingly, neither Canon nor HP spent any time trying to argue their printers do scan when they’re low on ink in the lawsuit responses I’ve read.

But when I went back now to check the same product page, it now reads differently: HP no longer claims this printer can scan “whenever” you want it to.

Now, we wait to see whether the case can clear the bars needed to potentially become a big class-action trial, or whether it similarly settles like Canon, or any number of other outcomes.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago

I wish there was an open source (2D) printer.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whenever anyone tells me they're on the market for a printer, I actively try and push them towards a laser. My Brother wireless laser has worked flawlessly for years, is extremely easy to maintain, and was not much more expensive than an inkjet when I bought it. The fact that the toner doesn't really go bad like ink, and is an order of magnitude cheaper, makes all the difference. It lasts for a stupid number of pages too (I think I'm on my 2nd or 3rd toner cart in all the years I've had the printer). And it's faster, the toner doesn't run if the page gets wet, etc etc.

These inkjet companies really prey on less technical consumers not understanding that a) they have another option and b) ink is marked up to be worth more than gold by volume.

[–] monolift@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is ridiculous. When will these companies decide they’ve made enough profits and run their companies in a way people enjoy the product as was probably originally intended. Sorry, wishful thinking there!!

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's ridiculous is the fuckin mugs that buy this shit. The same mugs that are buying software by subscriptions, they're actually 50% of the problem

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They think they don't have a choice. I've talked to people who use a printer maybe once a year for 3 pages but have convinced themselves they must have a printer in their home ready to go for the one time they'll maybe need to print something out.

Your local library has a printer you can use. Mine lets me print 10 pages per day for free. I'd rather go to the Library than deal with HP's bullshit, no question!

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Anyone with a brain that prints a few pages a year has a Brother laser though. Mine just sits gathering dust then goes......

......

.......

Ready

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The answer is simple, stop buying new printers that do this, keep your old one or buy a used one. Hurt them in their profits.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it's time to attempt some regulation. Probably won't happen but I don't see any other real, long term solution to this issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

This works until all the OEM's jump on the malicious malfunction gravy train.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

we have allowed corporations to grow too large, thats it. they have successfully abstracted away all human responsibility, ethics, common sense in lieu of profit.

i see only one solution; kill the stock market. its a sickness. its not even real, its all fake arbitrary numbers the rich absolutely control by leveraging their own information before the peons.

tax. every. trade. tax stock ownership.

if your business cant grow by being better at itself, then maybe start a new one.. dont start skimping materials to save costs... dont start leverage vertical integration so you can make an entire suite of terrible products..

fuck when is enough enough.

so, the constant reach for 'growth' and 'profit' is what is killing us. no business are left to organically just be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] donut4ever@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

We need a company like framework, or system76 or a similar consumer friendly company to make us a printer and end all this bullshit. I'm so sick of these assholes.

[–] Dum@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok this is off topic but... What are y'all printing so much? I print a form once or twice a year and just print at the store across the road or the library for 10ct a page. The printer I had probably cost me 3$ a page because I used it so rarely.

[–] rich@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

Kids, schoolwork.

load more comments
view more: next ›