34
Free software wisdom (pointieststick.com)
submitted 5 months ago by OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] solrize@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

This is basically link propagation of Lars Wirzenius's article "40 years of programming" which made the rounds a few weeks ago:

https://liw.fi/40/

I think it would have been preferable to link the article directly.

[-] perishthethought@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

I think they're both good reads and so appreciate both authors' points of view.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Why is software development political ?

[-] Goun@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago

Everything is political

[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 12 points 5 months ago

Imagine a country made up of flurbs and blorbs. Flurbs make up the majority of the government and don't recognise the existence of blorbs.

You are writing open source census software, do you include blorbs?

If you do, you get labelled a blorb sympathiser and the government stops funding development. Maybe throws you in prison.

If you don't, you get labelled a member of the Flurbian autocracy and are orchastrated from the hugely blorb open source community.

If you add a togglable option, you're still seen as sympathetic to the Flurbs because you are participating in oppressive regimes. And also supporting a blorb uprising by making them think they have a voice. Staying "neutral" is still picking a side.

So basically, you are forced to pick from a number of options based on your political (or strategic) view.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

2 things:

  1. Literal politics. Rarbg had project members volunteer to fight in the Russia-Ukraine war....... For both the side of Russia, and the side of Ukraine

  2. Drama. Contributing takes a lot of time and effort. People get attached to their ideas and contributions. When people start drifting apart and fighting, third parties have to play politics to keep people happy and working towards a common goal

[-] intrepid@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago

Those are only secondary politics in software development. You missed the primary politics of software - the power struggle expressed through code itself. It comes in many forms. But perhaps the most obvious one is the attempt by software corporates to wrestle control and freedom away from the user using DRM, Trusted computing, locked down devices, dark patterns, etc and relegate the user to the status of a renter.

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

It gives power over your users.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 5 months ago

Because software controls so many aspects of our lives. If we dont keep it open and respecting of our privacy, lots of people suffer.

[-] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Political means more than just parties and institutions of government. Society and economy is inherently political. Who owns what is produced and the tools used to produce it is inherently political. Therefore software development, just like any other type or work or other economic interaction, is political.

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
34 points (92.5% liked)

Linux

47293 readers
707 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS