this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
1194 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
3394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 24 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Theres people who dont use ad blocker? Do they also not use the internet?

[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Had a front end dev who didn't use adblocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TetraVega@lemmings.world 23 points 8 months ago

That's because ads fucking suck

[–] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

and among advertising, programming, and security professionals that fraction is more like two-thirds to three-quarters

Leopards, face etc

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't a majority of them also use Chrome? Because they're going to find that their adblockers are less and less effective.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (8 children)

That’s yet another reason to use a DNS as blocker, and not let your browser use DNS over https.

I haven’t done it myself yet, but I figure that sooner or later I’ll need to update my router to block all outbound DNS that doesn’t go through my DNS ad blocker. Some devices try to use their own hardcoded DNS to get around them…

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

DNS-based ad blocking is unfortunately much less effective. It's still better than nothing though, that's for sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I doubt these numbers. Almost nobody I know uses one on mobile

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

yeah, the internet without an ad blocker seems mostly unusable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

I remember the good ol days when the ads would lag up the loading of the page

Now they all load first and cover the entire content of the page because screw usability

Looking at you, every news outlet site ever

[–] Muscar@discuss.online 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I really doubt the numbers. It's so common to see people complain about ads online, even in places like here where you'd expect most people to use adblockers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danhab99@programming.dev 15 points 8 months ago

Even if nobody used ads, ads just don't work anymore. Kids can't even percieve them anymore, old people who click on everything are a shrinking market segment, and most people in the middle seek to learn about market offerings from influencers they've chosen to trust.

[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

People themselves have turned into ads since ads themselves don't do their job.

Look at influencers.

Instagram used to be fun for someone to share their journey, now it's ad...influencer...double ad...Triple influencer...Another ad...a real person sharing their journey...55 more influencer ads mixed with 29 actual ads.

Oh and the occasional OF girl who managed to flash some puss without it getting taken down.

I love when i bought something...(i assume) google thinks it's a great idea to advertise that exact combination of products from the exact webshop on the next website i visit.

How much did tiktok ruin google's brain to make them think that is going to be effective marketing?

Mankind truly is on the way down.

[–] stev3yd@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

ads are the worst. block them all! Would be great if an advertising company did not have the most popular browser.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's why I use firefox, never going to downgrade to manifest v3 ever

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BoisZoi@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Asked how likely big companies would be to abuse their data, Americans were most wary of TikTok (59 percent), followed by: Meta (56 percent), X/Twitter (49 percent), OpenAI (48 percent), Google (44 percent), Apple (41 percent), Amazon (40 percent), Microsoft (38 percent), Comscore (32 percent), and Adobe (31 percent).

I'm surprised people trust Microsoft and Amazon more than Apple; Amazon needs all the data they can get on you to build "better" profiles on what to sell you, ties your Alexa requests to feed advertising (you can opt out) and Microsoft, especially with Edge (post advertising and services team takeover) has been trying to send everything to Microsoft to feed both ads and their AI. FFS, even Outlook warns you now that they'll share your data with >800 "partners".

Apple is no saint, far from it, but people trust a conglomerate over it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 12 points 8 months ago

I'm still surprised so many people don't use them.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Ublock: Origin plugin on each browser, and/or a proper piHole style DNS blocker. Anything else is probably capturing your data to sell.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›