this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
242 points (96.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5222 readers
542 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
242
Biden's climate law has led to 86,000 new jobs and $132 billion in investment, new report says (www.cnn.com)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

While republicans are laser focused on drag queens and trans bathrooms.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

Giving the industry something to do is good for the economy?! Weird .... /s

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Remember when Republicans were angry that a oil company couldn't build a giant oil pipeline and said, "He's taking away jobs!" Totally ignoring that the pipeline would actually destroy jobs for truckers and everyone around that?

No point to the story I just wanted to share that.

[–] whats_a_refoogee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I don't have a comment on the law, but the logic in the headline is just stupid.

You can make a law requiring the lawns to have grass neatly arranged and you will create millions of jobs of people going through lawns with a fine comb and billions in investment to optimize and automate it.

"Creating" jobs and investment via regulation isn't a positive in and of itself. In fact, it can be detrimental like the aforementioned example.