Wait yahoo still exists?
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
103 points (94.0% liked)
Technology
59378 readers
3148 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yup. Everytime I need to test an internet connection I go to Yahoo cause I know the User wasn't there so no cache version.
Ctrl + f5
Yes. When their stock price dropped far enough, Verizon bought them.
I don't know how they're structured / what they really do as a company now, but they do still seem to have a well-regarded news division (or, they at least aggregate quality content).
Well, they used to until I read this. Once they throw this AI nonsense into it, I'm bailing.
Every time I end up on Yahoo News, it's an article that's been republished from somewhere else. I have no idea what their business model is. Ads, I assume.
Nowadays it seems like every company's business model is an overly complicated way to sell ads.
Is Yahoo news legit? I go to bbc.com for world news.
Yahoo Inc. owns TechCrunch, Autoblog, and Engadget, plus some other stuff, along with their own Yahoo-branded stuff (excluding Yahoo Japan, which is a totally separate company). It's a ton of eyeballs, and they sell the ads on their sites.
Keep AI out of the news. Sigh.
It's not all bad. Artifact uses "AI" to change clickbait titles into more descriptive ones for example.
Still a slippery-slope, IMO.
When something (news) is, by nature, designed to inform you of the current state of reality, introducing any process that hallucinates (read: makes shit up) should not be anywhere near them.
People are free to use LLM plugins to "de-clickbait" headlines as they want, but keep that out of the news process itself.
Just my 2 cents on it.
Slippery slope is a logical fallacy.
speaking even as an "ai" hater, even the worst LLM hallucination isn't nearly as bad as purpose made clickbait
I tried artifact for a bit, and the blog spam was so bad. Stuff would get promoted that would’ve never made it out of new on Reddit or Lemmy
Yeah, little control over presented articles was what led me to drop it when I was considering reddit alternatives but I'd kill for that de-clickbaiting feature to make way to RSS readers and link aggregators.
The amount of Yanko Design spam in my feed was driving me nuts.
If people use clickbaity titles in the first place it's cause they work, not because they don't know how to write informative ones...
Edit: my bad, didn't know what Artifact was...
It's for the Artifact users.
Yeah. There are definitely some novel uses and dev efforts. I’m terrified of the day AI data and user interaction data gets monetized though.
So they learned nothing from buying Tumblr?
Guess they didn't learn their lesson after Tumblr.
So a failing company is buying a failed new aggregator? How does Yahoo benefit from this?
Question (somewhat sarcastically): how has Yahoo! remained relevant and where does it even get its money from?
My mom likes the Yahoo Weather app on her iPad and that displays subtle ads.
Also Yahoo owns web sites like Engadget which run Yahoo's ads services.
"in months to come".
Years are composed of months and all months not elapsed are to come. So I call it now, won't be on Yahoo news ever.
is Yahoo still around?
After only reading half of the title I'm very hopeful about yahoos venture into the digital collectible card game market, I'm sure this will be a great success!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The two sides declined to share the cost of the acquisition, but both made clear Yahoo is acquiring Artifact’s tech rather than its team.
Mike Krieger and Kevin Systrom, Artifact’s co-founders, will be “special advisors” for Yahoo but won’t be joining the company.
“We have built something that a core group of users love,” the co-founders wrote in January, “but we have concluded that the market opportunity isn’t big enough to warrant continued investment in this way.” They said that the biggest reason to shut down was in order to focus on “newer, bigger and better things that have the ability to reach many millions of people.” The bet behind Artifact was always that AI had the potential to be a huge, internet-changing technology; maybe there were just more interesting things to work on than a news app without a big news audience.
“A lot of organizations care deeply about news and personalized content,” he says, “and I think they’re looking around and saying ‘Wow, there’s this new wave of AI… maybe we should figure out what’s going on.’ Maybe that’s what I discounted originally.”
The company first began exploring an Artifact acquisition after reading that shutdown letter, says Kat Downs Mulder, the general manager for Yahoo News.
Downs Mulder says more than 180 million people come to Yahoo News every month, which puts Artifact’s personalization and recommendation tech in front of a vastly larger set of users than it likely ever would have gotten on its own.
The original article contains 832 words, the summary contains 247 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Hey is that lady still there at - Ah, no she left in 2017 after selling yahoo to verizon for almost 5 billion.
Crazypants.
Saw Yahoo, misread as My Space...