this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
290 points (98.7% liked)

Games

16822 readers
1065 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've had so many VR fanboys going on and on about how it'll change the world, and I've always told them they were wrong because of the cost and tech limitations like battery life. Also the fact that people will think it looks stupid - even something as comparatively minimal as Google Glass was ridiculed, hated, and flopped.

Looks like I was right. Again.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I feel like glass was accidentally very beneficial for the industry.

It both drastically increased the general public's consciousness and awareness of the industry around AR/VR and then set the bar so low as to be trivial to exceed. People who mocked it know that bad AR with privacy concerns is not good, but when they try acceptable VR they are blown away by it.

It's mostly just the lack of the "killer app" equivalent that is holding us back.

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Half Life Alyx?

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 3 points 7 months ago

tbf, google glass and similar are AR rather than VR. Honestly the technology has been improving over the last few years, though not in as dramatic a fashion as when it went from a rare lab or obscure tech hobbyist thing to something mainstream consumers could buy, if expensively, more in the same sense that things like computer gpus get a little bit more powerful each generation but stay fundamentally being the same kind of thing. The cost has also gone down a bit on the low end (though the higher end is still thousands, its possible to get a decent headset for the mid hundreds, or low hundreds if you get a refurbished or lightly used one). I dont think it will really revolutionize all that much, but I do think it will gradually become a reasonably significant area of the entertainment market, in the same way that things like video game consoles arent revolutionary technology beyond a certain segment of the entertainment market, but are still common enough to be economically and culturally relevant. With the current prices and use case, video game consoles are essentially what they are. Im personally exited to see where the tech goes, even though it probably wont be the next smartphone the way some claim.

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Since when have any of these tech companies done anything but change the world for the worse?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

they got trolled by motion sickness and carpal tunnel

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

It sure would. Just not yet

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›