this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
81 points (88.6% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2096 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tensions are high over the possibility Iran will retaliate for an air strike that killed senior Iranian commanders nearly two weeks ago.

US officials had told CBS News, the BBC's US partner, that a major attack on Israel could happen imminently.

Israel has said it is ready "defensively and offensively".

"I can't speak to the size, scale, scope of what that attack might look like," US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said on Friday. But he added that the Iranian threat was "viable," saying Washington was "watching this very, very closely".

He said: "We are in constant communication with our Israeli counterparts about making sure that they can defend themselves against those kinds of attacks".

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Well, countries have the right to defend themselves, as Israel likes to repeat often. Even Iran.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well if Iran retaliates tomorrow let us remember that history starts on April 13th and as always israel definitely didn't do anything to provoke it.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Likud has caused this, Isreal. I hope this doesn't materialize but you need to change fucking course.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are they just trying to get into as many wars/conflicts as possible to stay in power?

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Probably just pushing the envelope at this point since no major Western powers have done much to stop them regarding Gaza.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

Don't forget Netanyahu is in the middle of a corruption trial right now. Guaranteed that has something to do with him stalling a cease fire.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago

Well, well, well, if it isn't the consequences of my own actions.

[–] ososalsosal@aussie.zone 12 points 7 months ago

The wording is something else.

Ensuring they can defend themselves... against another state defending itself from them?

Whatever. It's a mess that's gonna get worse and worse.

“What are causal relationships”, alex

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

BRB buying Raytheon stock

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

It’d be terrible if they targeted hospitals and kids wouldn’t it.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

Escalation seems unlikely. I'm not sure that there would really be anyone having Iran's back in this.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 7 months ago

Honestly, at this point, if I was around, I wouldn’t do shit.

Make them look like they were crying wolf, we can bring back 2003.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

So just to be clear...

Fundamentalist government sends financial aid to fundamentalist government's militia, fundamentalist militia attacks fundamentalist government's civilians, fundamentalist government's military invades and attacks fundamentalist government's civilians, so fundamentalist government sends financial, intelligence, and lethal aid to fundamentalist government's militia and gives access to fundamentalist government's compounds for their leaders, so fundamentalist government attacks fundamentalist government's compounds and therefore fundamentalist government says they're going to attack the fundamentalist government.