139
submitted 6 months ago by mox@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 66 points 6 months ago

Strange that Snowden, of all people, is assuming the NSA is waiting for this bill to pass to do this stuff rather than them having done it for a very long time already.

Does he really think the NSA isn't already spying on people through things like public wifi?

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 31 points 6 months ago

My understanding is this will make public operators liable to participate. Like, they have to have infrastructure in place to do the recording for the NSA.

Like, they could mandate back doors in all equipment.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Weren't all major trunks already wiretapped?

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

For at least 20 years it would seem Room 641A

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 47 points 6 months ago

Maybe they can reduce broadband prices then

[-] _sideffect@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

hahahahahahaahah

[-] Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com 29 points 6 months ago

Can I still watch weird porn or no?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

You can definitely still watch weird porn. Just know that you won't be the only one jerking off while you're doing it.

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

They could at least have the decency to do a video call so we can make eye contact while we climax. It's more wholesome that way.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

yes. In fact there will be mandatory minimums with stiff penalties for noncompliance, pun intended.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Depends on the porn, I guess 🤷

[-] Colonel_Panic_@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Yes, but now it's going to be competitive multiplayer.

[-] Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 months ago

Gonna play ranked. Just hope I don't get placed in bronze :/

[-] virku@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

I guess the policy of the Company I work for, that we don't use any service hosted in the USA, is sticking around then.

[-] kbotc@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

The NSA couldn’t really work in the US before this, but they were free and encouraged to work in foreign countries. You should look up how the “five eyes” actually worked, and ECHELON before it: Your data stored overseas is fair game for the NSA. Inside the country they needed a secret warrant to nab it.

[-] indog@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

They collected everything from the US but pretended they could only search comms with at least one non-US party without a warrant (there were no technical barriers to this and Snowden even claimed it would be easy for a low level NSA agent to read the President's emails). Foreigners may be easier to search without a warrant at the NSA, but using services outside the US gives a greater chance your data isn't in their database to begin with.

[-] flamingarms@feddit.uk 19 points 6 months ago

Since these articles never seem to include the bill, this appears to be it: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7888

[-] mansfield@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

May I remind everyone of CALEA. Just in case your skim of the page makes you think it is only for phone/telecoms...

In the years since CALEA was passed it has been greatly expanded to include all VoIP and broadband Internet traffic.

[-] _sideffect@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Doesn't the government already do this with our cellphones since they pass through the cell towers?

[-] Larry@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

What was the vote for this in the House called? Looking up my Congressman's votes but I see multiple FISA votes

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
139 points (78.4% liked)

News

23267 readers
3331 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS