this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
532 points (95.2% liked)

World News

39402 readers
2282 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The world’s top chess federation has ruled that transgender women cannot compete in its official events for females until an assessment of gender change is made by its officials.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] artvandelay@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of all the sports where someone's biological sex would matter, chess is not one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] youpie@lemmy.emphisia.nl 14 points 1 year ago

it was never about fairness.

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I recently heard the argument that no men would mentally survive loosing to a women in chess, especially grandmasters.

ngl I wonder if this contains more then a kernel of truth

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shapis@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Being a minority in any social setting brings difficulties that others just don't otherwise face.

Having a women's category for chess is a way of creating a safe environment for everyone to thrive.

[–] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Nah, wait, why the hell is there a separate women's category in fucking chess in the first place? Those in charge of this decision are 100% misogynists AND transphobes. There isn't a single good reason for this.

[–] CaptainBuckleroy@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm going to assume you aren't trolling.

Women traditionally have been discouraged from competitions, including chess. We are at the stage where we should be creating extra opportunities for women to be involved in these competitions. If we didn't, tradition and systemic practices would continue to discourage women.

Chess has no male category. There's co-ed, and female. This allows an extra space for women to compete against each other, feel safe, and make connections and friendships with other women in the minority. While still allowing them to compete in the coed category on a level playing field.

We will most likely continue to be at this stage for generations.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Minorities like trans people? A place where everyone can thrive?

It's fucking chess. I understand men may have more typical interest, but there shouldn't be divisions based on sex or gender. Maybe divisions for some neurodivergent people, but I'd bet on many of the great chess players being neurodivergent in some way.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

TIL: Chess had separate things for genders.

Weird...

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The sexist assholes were driving away women, so the separate league was to allow women to compete without (or with less) hostility.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Reading between the lines, I can kind of see this one. The point appears to be to correct for societal inequities in the space of chess. If you learned chess and came up as a masculine presenting individual, they believe that the environment was more advantageous to you, so transitioning later in life doesn't change that advantage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the kind of decision that makes me wish there was a capital question mark so I could just send that as a response.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›