this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Right to Repair

1556 readers
1 users here now

Whether it be electronics, automobiles or medical equipment, the manufacturers should not be able to horde “oem” parts, render your stuff useless if you repair it with aftermarket parts, or hide schematics of their products.

I Fix It Repair Manifesto

Summary article from I Fix It

Summary video by Marques Brownlee

Great channel covering and advocating right to repair, Lewis Rossman

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Engineer@discuss.tchncs.de
12
Disable tracking on Chevy Bolt 2019 (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 9 months ago by JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works to c/right2repair@discuss.tchncs.de
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

OnStar reports location and speed data to the car manufacturer. Sometimes they will sell this data to insurance companies to raise your premium, as several news stores pointed out a few weeks ago. I couldn't really find an advantage to OnStar, (I have my phone to call emergency services) so I disabled it by pulling it's fuse.

For my 2019 bolt, it's f31 in the instrument panel fuse box, just down and to the left of the steering wheel. The fuse box cover comes off when you pull it hard from the bottom.

I was able to find which fuse went to OnStar in the owners manual and labeled on the inside of the fuse box cover. You should be able to find it for your model car there too if it uses OnStar.

I did have the casualty of my speaker for calls and texts. I'm not able to use it right now. I'll see if I can dig in and reconnect it somehow, but we'll see.

Who knows that other into they're snitching back to GM, or what they could do in the future, so I recommend disconnecting it. Good luck!

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Cadillac here. I just unscrew the cellular antenna from the onstar module before leaving the lot. Looks like the onstar module is less conveniently located for bolts (it’s under my rear seats, I think it’s behind your screen), but that’s a good way to avoid collateral damage to other things on the same fuse. Since it’s a separate antenna from the gps, I even still get navigation, just without map updates. It’s all the good of a cell jammer, with none of the prison or fines. For now.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Even better because without the antenna load, the transmitter may burn out.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

inb4 manufacturers start baking it into the fuel injection cpu, and spending (your) extra money with encryption to lock the "owner" out like modern phones

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My cell phone doesn't have a fuel injection cpu.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

Pathetic, how old is your phone??? Like a thousand years or something?????

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

LMK if anyone finds the fuse my Kia uses to track my sex life per the TOS. Also unrelated, but please LMK if anyone finds my sex life. I seem to have misplaced it.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It's in your glove.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Have you looked in your socks?

[–] GreyLotus@thelemmy.club 1 points 9 months ago

For older cars, if the only "smart" thing you have is GPS, you should be fine since it only receives and doesn't transmit.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So if they're charging more for bad drivers, they'll charge less for good drivers, right?

If one company raises rates on bad drivers and uses the difference to offer lower rates to other drivers, they'll get more customers.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You should do stand-up, that was hilarious

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

I literally started typing "please don't reply if it's just some knee-jerk response" then decided it wasn't necessary. Yet here we are.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The thing even some reporters who’re alarmed at this story like: usage-based insurance which does actually let people pay less if they’re provably safe. Safe, and/or low mileage. They also want drivers to be alerted when aggressive driving is detected to be given a chance to improve.

I think a program like that might be OK today for those who are very well informed about it. One day if every new car is web connected, I can imagine insurers trying to gouge anyone not in a driver monitoring program.

Such a privacy & liberty nightmare has a small silver lining I almost refuse to acknowledge: in a full-on Big Brother driving world, with human-expert-equivalent analysis of behavior, raging murderous drivers would certainly find it harder to do 100+ MPH with their lights off entering an active crosswalk while passing a schoolbus in the rain.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

This turns out to be a bad thing. Enough people are uninformed or don't care about their privacy that over time an option that doesn't sell customer data loses customers and becomes more expensive and gets cancelled.

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or stop buying cars made by these companies.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

They all do it, to varying extents. The only good way to avoid it is buying a car old enough to not collect your data.

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Your first mistake is buying Chevy.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Only cheap EV, not much of a choice

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would rather ride a pogo stick to work than ever give Chevy another penny.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why?

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Because every experience I have ever had with them has been awful, and everyone I know who has owned a chevy has had constant issues. Transmission failures under 50k miles, electronics breaking on new cars, entire ac failing on a car with with only 40k miles, etc. I could keep going. GM clearly does not give a shit about quality control.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hmm I'll keep an eye out. Mine doesn't have a transmission though.

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Good luck!