this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
8 points (75.0% liked)

Technology

34811 readers
149 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Theoretically, the development could allow a submarine to travel faster than the speed of sound without producing the mechanical noise vibration that usually gives away its location, according to the researchers.

LOL, imagine a submarine traveling at Mach 1 under water... :)

That's 1224 km per hour ( or 761 miles per hour)

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The speed of sound in seawater is around 1500m/s or 5400 km/hr. Something tells me they won't actually be going supersonic.

The article shouldn't be referencing the speed of sound without specifying the medium for the sound waves and conditions such as temperature for water or temperature and pressure for air.

Also, the supercavitation would be incredibly noisy underwater, and at those speeds the vessel itself would produce a very loud pressure wave that would be easy to detect. So its advantage wouldn’t be in avoiding detection, it would be in moving fast enough that detection doesn't matter because no torpedo could intercept them.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, didn't think about that.

Maybe they can make torpedoes using the same tech....

[–] heysoundude@derpzilla.net 2 points 6 months ago

Torpedoes rely on sonar for targeting, so as long as they travel below the speed of sound in seawater…

[–] geography082@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

“fear china” , “world destruction” , ww3 fantasy click bait

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

South China Morning Post publishing propaganda? Say it's not so.