What sort of eco-fascist came up with that tag line? Yeesh.
It’s an legal argument by NIMBYS to justify not building more dorm rooms for college students
What is eco-fascism? Never mind, I looked it up.
That's a horrible slogan, and I like college students a lot better than Karens, but I have to question this organization's goals.
Population decline doesn't seem like a bad thing to me. It will require some economic changes so that pension systems designed as pyramid schemes don't collapse. Many of humanity's problems centered around limited resources would be alleviated by simply having fewer people.
Many of humanity's problems centered around limited resources would be alleviated by simply having fewer people.
They would also be alleviated through an economic system based on the equitable division of resources according to human need instead of the exploitation of them according to personal gain. Scarcity is enforced artificially.
We throw away 50 percent of edible food, so how is it that the problem is too many people?
We have more empty homes than homeless, so how is it that the problem is too many people?
Population Decline doesn’t really matter, but the group’s goals?
If they were another right wing Great Replacement nonsense group
They would side with the Karens, complain about “cULtUrE”, and tell you to get married whenever you can afford it or not
So far, they aren’t and harshly critical of that stuff
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News