this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
76 points (94.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4475 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

To conservatives who pushed to get rid of laws requiring pasteurization? No.

To literally everyone else: yes.

Unless you drink milk handed to you by a conservative, who swears that "it's totally safe", then maybe.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Removing safety measures was supposed to only hurt other people, not me!"

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

A 'giant middle finger to experts'

For now, to drink (and, especially, to produce) raw milk "is a way of breaking with convention and raging against the machine", said Weiss, "while engaging in caveman-inspired biohacking".

"Raw milkers want control over their lives", said Weiss, and that includes their food.

We don't need to attribute to malice what can be explained by sheer, unadulterated, absolute, abject stupidity.

Oh well, so long as it is properly labelled, I am actually fine with them having their "freedumbs" - it is rather when they extend out of that zone and try to tell OTHERS what to do with THEIR bodies that they need to be reigned in.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that in this case, their freedumbs are infectious. Some conservative raw milk-drinking nut catches H5N1, he might be the "lucky" guy who it mutates in enough to spread from human to human, and then we've got a brand new pandemic on our hands.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Exactly. (And I swear I could hear that gif.)

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The milk is probably safe if it’s pasteurized. Not so sure about the ranchers who are repeatedly exposed to sick cows tho.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They may be more immune than anyone. Like how milk maids didn't get smallpox because they were exposed to cowpox first.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

They may be more immune than anyone.

Not all farmers have healthy immune systems and it only takes one.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Just as long as they aren’t spreading it to everyone else they run into who doesn’t work with cows.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Not so sure about the ranchers who are repeatedly exposed to sick cows

Not to leave out many farmers drink raw milk.

Source: Was married into a dairy farm.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago

Drinking it immediately after milking the (healthy) cow is perfectly safe, and people have been drinking unpasteurized milk that was taken from the cow that morning for millenia. The risk/reward ratio is definitely not worth it though if you dont plan on drinking the milk within an hour of milking though.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Just switch to oat/almond/pea/soy/other milk's. Same nutritional benefits, no sick cows involved.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

But not the same yummy taste, some would say it's an inferior taste.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I switched to almond milk years ago simply because the shelf life is 3x or more that of cow's milk. I never go through cow's milk before it expires so it's been great for me. The flavor is a bit different but it's not worse.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

For me it depends on the brand, added sugars, and what you’re using it for (cooking, cold cereal, smoothies, drinking it straight). This seems to be the case for all of the plant-based milks. But it can be enjoyable finding the ones you like.

[–] Chestnut@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Same nutritional benefits

Are they?

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/milk-and-plant-based-milk-alternatives-know-nutrient-difference

The macro and micro nutrients are different (but FDA makes a good case for fortified soy milk)

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Reading this in bed without my glasses and I'll be damned if I switch to cat milk.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah! And no babies ripped from their mothers.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

As long as it's not oat flu, should be fine