this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
72 points (93.9% liked)

Linux

48212 readers
719 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 20 points 6 months ago

Crossing my fingers that someone will step up to create a Flatpak 🤞

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So now we have Lapce, Cosmic-Edit, Helix (vim clone) and Zed, all in Rust. Nice!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

If only Helix would have vim mappings and a plugin system, it would kill neovim over night...

In it's current state, it's only suitable for people who don't need any plugins. So if you want a plugin for picking a virtual environment in python for example, you just can't do it in Helix.

I don't know, to me it's really limited without any form of plugins. I truly wish it had a plugin system because tons of people would write high quality rust plugins.

[–] mke@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's a weird way to look at the projects, in my opinion ("if only X had Y, it would kill Z...").

Helix and Neovim have different approaches to editing, configuration, etc. They don't need to be competing for users. Neovim can exist for the people who want an editor with Neovim's ideas, same for Helix, and that's just fine.

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Helix having vim mappings would defeat the purpose. But once you do hx --tutor it's super easy and intuitive coming from vim/nvim

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What means "vim mappings"? I only ever used helix so I supposed it has the same key bindings as vim?

[–] przmk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

Not really. Helix is closer to Kakoune which is based on the modal editing of Vim but reimagined a bit.

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago

Vim and helix have different keymappings for the same tasks, for example to delete a word, helix you type wd, but in vim you type dw. As a vim user of like 6 years, I prefer the helix bindings after understanding them. But the reason I say helix having vim bindings would defeat the point is that if you want vim bindings, just use vim or neovim with plugins. Those are both mature projects that will serve people who want vim bindings better, either switch to helix all the way, or don't imo

[–] gramgan@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

I think it’s possible to remap Helix to be almost (if not completely) Vim-like. I got it to be (I think completely) Kakoune-like with like 15 lines in my config.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

wasn't this a mac only editor? Or am I confused with another?

[–] ralakus@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

It was. There's a partially working Linux build available and it looks like they're trying to port to windows too

[–] featured@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

It is but they’ve been making huge leaps towards a Linux build and that’s what this is about