this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22767 readers
448 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
20
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Yllych@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
 

Was thinking about this intellectual period last night. I don't know a lot but I get the vague impression of it being too much on the revisionist side for my taste, although the label New Left is so broad that I'm sure there's a huge span of thought that it gets applied to.

What theory still holds up from that time, what theorists do you agree/disagree with, what texts would you recommend to people who want to understand more about this time, t's origins,links to the French 1968 movement ,etc?

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pluto@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago

They may include Maoists as well.

It's more of an "era" in leftism than an actual coherent movement.

But they tend to be anti-Soviet and influence our opinions about the Soviet Union nowadays as well.

For example:

You never hear about how the Soviet Union really helped African liberation during the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s.

Or how they really excelled in the physical and social sciences.

You only hear about the bad, like Gorbachev and some of the revisionist factions in power at the time.

[–] Pluto@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

New Left is kinda anti-communist but has lots of very leftist ideas, if that makes sense to you.

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'd recommend checking out some of the stuff Gabriel Rockhill has been cooking up lately about the New Left and Western Marxism more broadly. He's working on a book on the topic and his articles and interviews lately have been pretty interesting.

I haven't watched this yet (I just found this trying to recommend you something) but it looks like a good summary of his work - a lecture called The Imperial Theory Industry & the Compatible Left Intelligentsia

(I should add that while I haven't watched this, now that I know it exists I am going to.)

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

The new left is indeed broad. From the dead-end strands of ultra-left to the dead-end strands of right-opportunist to even the outright off the deep end "post-left" banditry and ultra-left to reactionary pipeline that existed among the ultras intelligentsia.

It had its bed of kindling rooted in the beginning of the cold war and how the "iron curtain" built by the western powers slowly began to isolate the Communist parties in the West from the Communist parties in the East. The first spark to ignite the great sundering of the international Communist movement was the death of Stalin and slanderous lies of Khrushchev.

The fuel that grew the conflagration was the movements of the state apparatus' in the West against the Communist Parties. These were the Red Scares and Gladios would scare off, drive underground, frame for crimes, or outright murder the veteran Communists in the West and wreck much of the work they had built up through the generations.

And finally the accelerant that turned the fire into an inferno was sino-soviet split. It had opened the proverbial pandoras box and unleashed upon the Communist movement a hundred poisonous flowers of thought. Each proclaimed and extolled itself as the true movement and nipped at the ankles of any who said the same. It was an era of petty lords helf aloft their banners and warred opon each other as much, if not more at times, as much as they warred against the State.

But like any fires, the fuel would burn out and soon all that was left of the new left was cinders and nothing achieved and left standing in their name. The death of Mao and the overthrow by the ultra-left gang of four by the Bukharinite-esque faction of the CPC would shatter the maoist movement just as the Khrushchevite revisionism had first schismed the Communist movement and lead to the severe weakening of the ultra-left for the foreseeable future. And a few short years later, Gorbachev would take the helm of the Soviet Union and begin his own right-opportunist shift of the communist movement straight into the rocks with his programs of Glasnost and perestroika. His most naked drive towards rightist liquidationism emboldened the right-opportunists of the new left that embedded itself in the Communist movement to pursue their own respective partys liquidation. This culminated in the overthrow of the Soviet Union and the complete vacuum of despair caused by the home of the Revolution being vanquished. The guiding light of the communist movement was lost and all the ships that were the communist parties of nations were lost at sea with ultra-left piranhas swarming around us and rightist-traitors among us prying the very boards of the ship loose trying to sink us.

All of this is to say I think there is nothing of value that grew out of the new left save for the black panther party, whom, after correcting their more ultra-left tendencies, were the most like the communist party in the void left during the time that the communist party had been driven underground and were slowly reemerging into the political scene. I would suggest examining their history towards their end as the best place to find useful tactics.