Fantastic video but Karl seems to steer around one important question around the 3 minute mark. He is asked what is it that gave him such conviction towards his conclusions, to which he responds by reframing the question and listing off other notable folks who have come forward with similar claims. I was really hoping for a specific answer to that question.
this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1233 readers
2 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That stood out to me too. Given Nell’s roles over the years, it’s likely he’d have more access and potentially direct access to some of the programs previously mentioned by David Grusch. If that is the case, then he may be limited in what he can publicly discuss.
I’d definitely like to know what convinced him and what drives him to push for disclosure. Though, I can understand side stepping the question for this event. Today’s discussion didn’t seem to be geared to expanding on what’s currently out there for information on UAP and NHI. Rather, it was likely aimed at bringing the topic to a new audience.
Hopefully we hear more from Nell and others soon, along with more info to solidify their claims.
Great post. Been waiting for this.
His immediate answer to the very first simple and direct question:
Interviewer - do you believe that a higher form of non human intelligence has visited this planet?
Nells response: Non human intelligence exists, ... it's been interacting with humanity, this interaction is not new and its been ongoing...
Interviewer - how confident are you that that is true?
Nell - there's zero doubt.
It's just so cool to hear this. What do the debunkers say about Nell? He's lying to get a book deal?
I've known his stance on the topic, but it's still amazing to hear someone with his background stating that.
David Grusch had originally been scheduled for this event, but I'm happy that Knell spoke in his place. I'm also glad that he listed off other names that have spoken out on NHI and UAP. At this point it feels like an open secret in government and the military that just needs a little more push to get officially addressed.
Yeah I'm also glad Nell was Grusch's replacement. The fact that these guys are/were really high up, clean slate, no bullshitters really hits hard. And how they say everything so "matter of fact".
This really feels like the slow/soft disclosure. The Schumer amendment, and importantly the portion that was gutted, is all a big part of it. How can people deny it now? Yes, we all want to see the "cool stuff" and really hard evidence, I get it. But I feel like the default position should be essentially what Nell said, that the gov't has pretty much admitted to it. If debunkers want to say it's all a conspiracy theory or scam, I feel like they need to provide some convincing evidence. I don't think im asking to prove a negative given everything we have at this point.
I'm still bitter about that amendment. Would love to be a "fly on the wall" in regards to the House Republicans that were responsible for the block. Were they payed out without being informed of why, or are they clued in? I could see them just taking money and being told just to block it, and what specifics to remove. We may never know. If we get full disclosure, it might not matter and be forgotten. I'd still like some accountability though, lol.
“So, non-human intelligence exists, non-human intelligence has been interacting with humanity. This interaction is not new, and it's been ongoing, and unelected people in the government are aware of that." "There's zero doubt." Colonel Karl Nell speaking at SALT on UAP, NHI and the state of disclosure.
Looks like a retired rear admiral Tim Gallaudet is backing up Karl Nell's statement!
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7198943942657069056
Gallaudet brings a much needed additional perspective to the discussion. We have Grusch speaking of special access programs with recovered UAP, Fravor and Graves speaking of military and commercial pilot sightings, Schumer and others from Congress with access to military and intel briefings, and Gallaudet with oceanic and atmospheric data. That's just a few of the recent names involved in a push for disclosure. Add in public and individual experiences over the years and it's clear that there is a phenomenon occurring that deserves investigation and answers.
Its been more then a day and i have yet to find a single big news network that covers this.
Even the debrief which posts like 99% uap stuff, not a single word. This isn't normal.
Yeah, I searched last night to see if it was picked up anywhere and didn’t find anything significant. I’d imagine we’ll at least see some opinion articles soon, but I figured some news outlet would have run with this.