this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
98 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"The meeting… featured about 40 Arab American leaders, Grenell, Trump’s son-in-law Michael Boulos, and Boulos’ father, Massad Boulos…. Grenell came off as unsympathetic to the plight of Palestinians while actually angering some participants by reiterating a comment from Trump’s other son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who said in March that Israel should remove Palestinians from the valuable ‘waterfront property’ in Gaza.”

Said one attendee: “He repeated Jared Kushner’s statement about beachfront property, which I think floated like a lead balloon in the room.”

Worse.Timeshare.Pitch.Ever.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm amazed they even took the meeting TBH.

[–] dumples@kbin.social 14 points 5 months ago

Taking the meeting is the message. No one should have expected anything but terrible promises. But it sends a message

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Both attendees who spoke to NOTUS said Arab American leaders told Grenell they had three conditions for supporting Trump in November: his support for an immediate cease-fire, funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency — which has been the primary provider of humanitarian aid in Gaza — and a commitment to enact the so-called Leahy Laws in Gaza. (The Leahy Laws, written by former Sen. Pat Leahy of Vermont, prohibit the United States from funding foreign militaries that violate human rights.)

They have to know Trump will say anything to get elected again, right? He's literally running to stay out of jail. It's funny they called him clueless.

Pot and kettle and all that.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

I would be pretty confident taking this meeting was only a signal that they're open to other factions. If the democrats don't start doing something, they don't automatically have their support... At least, that's the idea. They effectively do automatically have their support because of how horrible the MAGA side is, which sucks.

[–] bobsuruncle@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am amazed they believe him about the Muslim ban. When he gets elected he will enact that within 3 month.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s a hell of a sales pitch. Help elect a Republican and that Republican MAY not ban the people practicing your religion.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Help elect a Republican and that Republican MAY not ban the people practicing your religion.

...after essentially already doing that in a smaller scale during his first term.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

$$$ >= Religious beliefs