Trump trial live updates: Trump says 'Mother Teresa could not beat these charges' as jury deliberates (abcnews.go.com)

submitted 5 months ago by dogsnest@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15951173

No way did trump say that!

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] manucode@infosec.pub 47 points 5 months ago

I don't think Mother Theresa ever had to pay a porn star not to tell the public about her cheating on her pregnant wife while running for office.

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

That's only because she never ran for office

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 months ago

Fair

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago

If mother Teresa were on trial for something that was basically proven before the trial why do you think she would beat the charges?

Oh right it's empty word salad for his base right right.

[-] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

If Mother Teresa couldn't beat the charges, that would mean that it's because a fair and impartial trial found her guilty? Definitely word salad

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 27 points 5 months ago

Curious name drop. I guess both Trump and Mother Teresa are both all about making people suffer?

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

It's really sick, she thought suffering was some sort of gate to heaven. So she made people suffer when they were dying.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

If she really thought that she would not have accepted care she denied others

[-] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

Well obviously she was helping people get to heaven so she was a shoe in and didn't need to suffer to get in /s

[-] 108@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

She was a sick human being

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Sounds like the confession to me

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago

yeah im pretty sure if she did what he did she could not beat them as well.

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This post was between 2 posts from the Scoop the Poop community on my feed. Perfectly placed.

The attention this void of a human being gets, is unfathomable.

Edit: not the post per se, but the subject of the post was placed perfectly between the poop scoopers.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I can't see Mother Teresa raw dogging Stormy Daniels and then paying her to keep quiet about it.

Pope Benedict, maybe. But not Mother Teresa.

[-] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago

I mean... Teresa certainly wouldn't involve a condom even if aware of having an STD...

[-] SuperSpaceFan@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think the concept that TFG is not getting is that Mother Teresa would not be in this position in the first place.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2024

72 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19159 readers

4557 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News