this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
453 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Minneapolis mayor vetoes minimum wage bill for Lyft, Uber drivers: ‘An inexcusable betrayal of Minneapolis workers’::The city’s mayor nixed minimum wages for ride-hailing drivers in a move one city council member called “an inexcusable betrayal of Minneapolis workers.”

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] malloc@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, he negotiated a contract with Uber only. Lyft drivers fucked. Drivers will probably flee to Uber for higher guarantees. Will Lyft compete to retain their talent or continue to pay the minimum? Or will they drop out of the city entirely and leave Uber as the de facto monopoly in drive sharing?

Mayor pretty much gave a middle finger to its people with the veto. I wonder how much the mayor was wined and dined to ignore 8 months of work by the city and consultants

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LMFAO, it's a verbal contract bro, they aren't required to do anything. They won't do anything. This was just purely fucking over the people.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Verbals binding. Hope there's audio of that conversation.

And any gumption to hold them to their word. Both of them.

[–] db2@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

No, they're right. Verbal contracts are binding in a court of law. Now, Uber having a fuckton of money to make it impossible to enforce is a different thing altogether.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Someone should show the mayor that you can't treat large portions of your constituents like they're trash.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

But they can. gestures broadly to everything

[–] Pacers31Colts18@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used to ride share drive part time. I don't think there is anyone who does strictly Uber or strictly Lyft. You do both to get more money.

[–] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bad journalism that doesn't explain the current state of things for the drivers. Not everyone is up on the sanctioned exploitation of drivers.

What are they getting now and how does this improve things?

Don't worry! The reader can find that in a different article.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Sourcing this critical information is an exercise left to the reader