65
submitted 5 months ago by limerod@reddthat.com to c/android@lemdro.id

cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/20003770

Tensor G4 of Google Pixel 9 shows only a slight performance bump on leaked benchmarks

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aleph@lemm.ee 51 points 5 months ago

Meh, who cares about performance benchmarks for phones?

I'm much more interested to see how power efficient Tensor 4 is, and whether or not they've fixed the connectivity issues.

[-] noredcandy@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Knowing Google, they will be fixed when the phone is released then broken after the first software update and never addressed again.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 months ago

I miss the Nexus concept. There were some whiffs, but then wins like the Nexus 6. Having a vendor juggle was always fascinating, and they mostly used good modems.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

What I wouldn't give for a Nexus 5 with more modern internals.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 5 months ago

The first few Pixel A models were kind of that

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nah, I mean, literally size, shape, external form. Gimme dat soft touch plastic removable back.

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago

It was a beaut, wasn't it

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The Nexus 6 was ahorrible phone. It had so many issues. GOOLE AND Huawai got class actionaw suit over this phone. It was a giant piece of shit.

[-] dorkage@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

That was the Nexus 6P. Nexus 6 was made by Motorola and overall an amazing phone

Performance and battery life are deeply connected. Race to idle is how almost everything is designed around.

[-] jcarax@beehaw.org 5 points 5 months ago

I'm pretty sure they're just treading water this year, and focusing on their in-house design for the Tensor G5 in 2025. Hopefully it doesn't break Graphene support.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I though G4 was supposed to bring a big improvement to the modem, or is that going to be G5?

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

I'll tell you a secret it well always be the next one. Has been that way forever with Google hardware. Don't know why people still think they well do something magical at this point.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Possibly, lol. Although going from Samsung's to their own completely custom silicon will be the best chance of seeing some actual improvements.

[-] jcarax@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

It's sounding like an upgrade from Exynos 5300 to 5400, so I'm not expecting much.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 5 points 5 months ago

Performance matters. The tensor chipsets throttle heavily because they have bad thermals and they cannot sustain their performance after just 3 minutes of mild to heavy use. After 10 minutes they perform worse than midrange snapdragon processors. It would be different if pixels were cheap. But, unfortunately they are not. Making this alongside connectivity issues a sore point for pixels.

[-] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

seriously. if Samsung was rootable I'd never get pixel.

[-] andreluis034@bookwormstory.social 2 points 5 months ago

Isn't the bootloader unlockable on Samsung devices? What's stopping you from rooting it?

[-] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

not on us models

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Except Samsung with Exynos is more or less the same in terms of performance and thermals.

[-] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I'd use the international versions but they don't have all the usa bands. see here...

https://omnicorex.com/blog/flagship-battle-2024

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Right, but these new benchmarks don't speak to that, do they?

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago

It's a minor improvement at best. The thermal performance should be similar if not the same.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

The thermals between the different Tensors are not the same. The G3 is made on a smaller manufacturing node and it's significantly more power efficient in daily use.

The a-series are priced at the mid range and they also use the same chipsets as the more expensive Pixels.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago

When I was talking about thermals I was primarily speaking about the tensor G3. The previous generations are way worse.

As for A series being priced midrange. In my country it costs Rs52999($635) for the base 8/128gb model. I can get the top 16/256gb variant of the oneplus 12R with the much superior Snapdragon 8 gen 2 for Rs45999($551). There are also other options like the Poco X6 pro, motorola edge 50 pro, and the Realme GT 6T which cost significantly less.

Unless, pixels start approaching the price point of other smartphones. Its a no go to pay the google price just for software and camera alone.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well in that case the Pixels are simply overpriced there and there's definitely more hardware to be had in the ones you mentioned.

On a separate note, the Snapdragon based devices simply don't compare in security update support. That's the primary reason I've been putting up with the first gen Tensor. All of the first gen Pixels in use will be secure till the end of 2026. And the 8/8a series till 2030/31.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago

Samsung s24 series promise 7 years of OS and security updates just the same as pixel 8 smartphones. Fairphone also promises up to 8 years of security updates and at least 5 os updates until 2031.

Samsung uses a mix of snapdragon and exynos. Fairphone uses an usual but enterprise grade midrange snapdragon processor. So, 7 years of updates do happen with snapdragon. Just depends on the manufacturer and the contract they have with Qualcomm.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

This is new development with Qualcomm's chipsets and they've historically been extremely reluctant to sign contracts for long update support so I'm skeptical till proven otherwise. They've always been a super profit maximizing company and they've typically been the king of the hill for Android and still are for modems, so they have all the incentives to not sign such agreements or not honor them. We don't know how strong these are. I'd be super happy to be proven wrong. I've worked (and still do) on the embedded side with devices built on QC chipsets and Qualcomm behave today as they did a decade ago.

[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 17 points 5 months ago

How is the camera bump getting worse???

[-] evo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I like the camera bump on my Pixel Fold since it shouldn't go all the way across the back and is still square-ish. These are similar but worse. Pixel 6 was peak design IMO.

[-] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago
[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 9 points 5 months ago

Idk Pixel 6 feels like the most iconic version so far, really sad seeing what direction they've taken it

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 3 points 5 months ago

Agreed. The Pixel line had a really distinctive design language with the 6 but they've moved further away from that with each release since.

[-] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Still using my 6 Pro, the back glass is scratched to hell and back and covered in smudges

Yes, I know I can take better care of it, but at the end of the day, glass is glass

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago

The previous ones were so much better.

[-] figaro@lemdro.id 3 points 5 months ago

Arguably, the average person will not care. My mom will probably buy one because, and I quote, "Your phone takes good pictures!"

Benchmark tests don't matter to normal people

[-] evo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

This shouldn't surprise anyone. The vast majority of their efforts have to be going into the fully custom (TSMC) G5 for next year.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Any word on what modem they're going to use in the G5?

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What a bull shit excuse. Google has ruined their name in the phone space. I imagine pixel we'll be dead in a decade after never really taking off

And next year it well be well it's g1 the next one well be better. Rinse and repeat everytime Google does hardware. .

[-] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

Would the custom rom scene be affected by getting tsmc chip?

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
65 points (93.3% liked)

Android

17640 readers
132 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS