this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Despite much “distasteful” trade carrying on, Keatinge notes some "is very challenging to cut, like the ongoing trade in nuclear fuel." The AP news agency reported in August Moscow was raking in hundreds of millions of euros selling nuclear fuel to the US and Europe, which are entirely dependent on Russian products.

Certainly worth thinking about, when new reactors are planned.

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why can we not buy nuclear fuel from Australia?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Australia produces uranium ore, but you need to enrich it to produce nuclear fuel. Austrlia does not have the facilities to do that right now. Russia controlls 40% of the global enrichment facilties. Right now France, USA, UK, Germany and the Netherlands also have such facilities and well some other countries too, but besides Japan an maybe India both of which do not have large ones, I would not rely on them either.

There are a lot of Soviet designed nuclear reactors in the EU. Those all tended to buy Russia production as it was cheap and the Russians obviously understood those reactors best. That still continues. Hungary has Russia build them a new nuclear power plant right now.

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The soviet reactors part makes sense. Still we should strive to import the ore from Australia and enrich it ourselves

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

The EU is propably somewhat fine. 62% of enrichment is done within the EU, but 30% comes from Russia. The problem is that such facitilites are really difficult to build, so it takes years and to the best of my knowledge none are planned. Germany shutting down its reactors however should help in terms of that.

However if we actually would want to help out our allies it becomes much much worse. The US has only one single plant, which is enough to supply 5% of the US needs, due to the US buying weapons grade uranium from Russia after the Cold War ended, which destroyed the US enrichment industry. South Korea does not have an enrichment plant at all and Japans is tiny. So both are basicly fully dependend on imports. If you can not import from the EU and Russia then only other option is China. The democratic world certainly needs more of these facilities. However nuclear proliferation is a massive problem. Enriching uranium allows one to build nukes. One of the reasons Germany is not shutting down its enrichment plant is to be able to make sure the US keeps up nuclear sharing. If the US for some reason would stop it, there at least used to be plans to allow Germany to build a nuke within a few months. I imagen similar things would be possible for other countries as well.

[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Target the regime and its supporters. Plenty of oligarchs/kleptocrats living the high life in the west.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A Yale University study from July 2022 claimed the sanctions, which targeted a sweep of industries and trades, were “catastrophically crippling” the Russian economy, citing the ruble's collapse and mass exodus of Western firms.

Its GDP - an indicator of economic health measuring the total value of goods and services a country produces - is predicted in a Reuters poll to rise 0.7% this year, all the while other European economies splutter and stagnate.

“There are plenty of gaps in the existing sanctions regime,” Tom Keatinge, Director of the Centre for Financial Crime and Security Studies at Royal United Services Insitute, tells Euronews.

While these are ostensibly to pay for energy imports that are still allowed in some cases, Keatinge says transactions are “very hard to police”, suggesting payments for oil and gas could mask purchases of other items, such as high-tech military goods.

“If you block off trade by one route, it just finds another way,” details Harrison, citing a historical example of World War One where exports were “simply rerouted” through neutral European countries after Britain imposed a naval blockade on Germany.

Led by ultra-nationalist Viktor Orban, Hungary has gained notoriety for continuing to purchase Russian energy, while some worry sanctions fatigue is gripping Austria, with one political party saying last October restrictions should be put to a referendum.


The original article contains 1,195 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't like this. Especially that these summaries tend to rise to the top.

[–] silvercove@lemdro.id -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reality. They are missing reality.

The sanctions are toothless because there is no reason for China, India, Brasil or Turkey to comply with them.