this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
1160 points (97.6% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9723 readers
652 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 131 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Both probably give the same exact water at the same temp.

[–] mdd@lemm.ee 157 points 5 months ago
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 88 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, Steve called the manufacturer about that, and they're supposed to be sending someone out this month. Maybe next. Our deepest apologies for the inconvenience.

No, the system won't allow us to discount or refund.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 40 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's my favourite line, "I'm sorry we can't do that because of how our system works."

"But you're ripping me off and that's illegal."

"I'm sorry, the system won't allow me to refund you."

"So you're admitting that your company built a system that rips people off and breaks the law as a matter of policy? You realise that's worse, right?"

[–] archon@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's just finger pointing to avoid liability.

"Oh no, that's not our fault! It's these guys who did it, so talk to them!"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or they warm the tap water

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If the water is cooled with a low-energy method like a Peltier cooler, the heat has to go somewhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 124 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

Even if it was free, opening an app to get water is bullshit.

Edit: Let the record show, I was referring to the chilled water.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bestusername@aussie.zone 93 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Jokes on you; I torrent my water!

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A torrent of water, if you will.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 23 points 5 months ago

I just cry myself a river.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 85 points 5 months ago (5 children)

If this was downtown or at parks I can kinda see them providing something. Knowing this is likely at a university library or building its just removing access that was already there.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 133 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Fuck that. If it's downtown or at a park the fucking municipality can afford $1.99/mo

We need more public facilities. This privatization bullshit can kick rocks

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago (4 children)

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=%28specific+heat+of+water%2912.8K%281+gallon+*+water+density%29

200kjoules of heat must be removed from a gallon of water to cool from 55F to 32F (out of the ground down to pleasant drinking temperature).

Assuming a COP of 2 for your compressor (conservative), that's 100kjoules or 1/36 of a kWh.

High price for a kWh of electricity is $0.25 in the US. So for your $2 subscription, you can pay for 8kWh per month or enough to cool 288 gallons of water or roughly 9 gallons per day. More than anybody would rightly use.

What a fucking ripoff.

[–] TheDezzick@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention that, in a place like a public park, 55F water is totally fine. It isn't the coolest most refreshing drink of all time but it's damn good from a public fountain on a 90F day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 78 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I feel that the majority of innovation occuring in modern capitalism is confined to two key areas:

  1. Regulatory capture and market control.

  2. New ways to mindfuck people into overpaying for goods and services.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Productive innovation ceases the moment growth has reached its peak. It is then replaced by counterproductive "innovation", such as finding new ways to nickel and dime your customers, reduction in quality or dismissal of employees. All in the name of simulating "growth" to please the shareholders.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The entire country has incentivized its top minds to developing ad tech bullshit. Like literally our astrophysicists are working at Stitch Fix instead of doing astrophysics.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 44 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Reefill.com isn't even a registered domain. I call horseshit.

[–] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 61 points 5 months ago (3 children)

You are right, it is not a current valid domain. It was an Indiegogo crowdfunded project though, and I am guessing it failed.

[–] joenforcer@midwest.social 55 points 5 months ago (20 children)

https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/178262-56#overview

Went under about two years after the crowdfunding. Guess people didn't want to pay $2 a pop for chilled and filtered tap water.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/reefill-ditch-bottled-water-for-good#/

There are several articles about it and an indiegogo, if fabricated a lot of people bought it few years ago.

[–] melbaboutown@aussie.zone 42 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's how corporations nickel and dime you. I resist subscription services almost completely (I pay for cloud backup storage for my phone in case of breakage/theft and that's it) because as well as being a constant financial drain they inevitably degrade and enshittify, often even removing things you paid for

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

"Your water subscription has increased by $1, thanks for being our customer. Reminder, creation of public fountains and bottle sharing activities are punishable by law!"

You sigh and delete the email. They send out the same message every month.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (17 children)

I would rather take the tap water than trust the maintenance of whatever filter they put in there.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] somewhiteguy@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Is it still a thing? The website doesn't go anywhere and I can't find the app. All I can actually find are a few articles talking about how ridiculous it is to have a $2 subscription service on water fountains.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I found this indiegogo link from 7 years ago which gives a little more background. Its not quite as horrible as the picture suggests, I think.

There's some FAQ and Comments that give some background, like this one:

Rier Esor 7 years ago I’ve been asked by a few people: why do we need reefill water stations when there are water fountains around NYC (if you look hard enough!) and we >all have tap water at home? What’s my best answer?

Patrick Connorton 7 years ago PROJECT OWNER We're also working with New York City and the Port Authority to map free public bottle filling stations around town -- these are usually in or near >parks but, unfortunately, need to be off six months a year to avoid freezing and can be challenging to maintain. Reefill is a natural complement to >these fountains, filling in the gaps in parts of town where it is impractical or cost-prohibitive to install a water fountain.

So it doesn't sound like these were replacing existing free water fountains, but instead offering free (and paid) water in places never offered before by generating revenue from the paid water to support the installation of any water (including new free water) in places that had none before.

It also looks like the project died in 2019.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

All I could find were articles from 2017 and I haven't heard of it before, so I'm gonna say it's not a thing any more.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 36 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'm not going to hate the company for trying, but if you're a building admin using these instead of Oasis or Elkay fill stations you're a huge fucking asshole.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

But with all the money they're saving, they'll be able to renovate the admin building for the first time in two years, or have a nice dinner for the big donors, or give even more money to the football team.

Edit: assuming this is a uni. If not: won't someone please think of the investors?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Product designers are supposed to understand pareidolia and will often intentionally put faces into their designs. Some designs look happy, others like sports cars can be made to look aggressive.

The top of this design looks like some combination of angry, sad and disappointed, which I like to think is intentional.

[–] dogsoahC@lemm.ee 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Drill a fucking hole in that motherfucker and siphon it off. Or just drink tap water. It's fine. At least where I live. But still drill a hole in there to fuck with them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I am not often in favour of shooting people.

For legal reasons this concludes my statement.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Property damage of this is valid. especially if you can give people water for free next to it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

when you see shit like this you are morally obligated to make them lose money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hierophant_nihilant@reddthat.com 27 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It's a failed crowdfunding campaign, their last tweet is from 2017

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Starkstruck@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Pay for the PRIVILEGE of not drinking contaminated water!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Why are people trying to justify this, the city can put in chilled water taps like those Elkay ones for super cheap. Then when shitty businesses like these go under, you aren't left with a useless machine with no other water source nearby. Relying on private entities for basic things like this is just objectively a bad idea if it can be at all avoided.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›