this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
1058 points (98.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

2902 readers
386 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 142 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Stop using Google. You can’t change them, you have to leave.

[–] CheeryLBottom@lemmy.world 68 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I'm using Duck Duck Go now.

[–] Switorik@lemmy.zip 52 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I swapped to ddg about a year ago. I've noticed their search results are not the greatest either. There is so much spam and paid articles that make it to the top search results I often end up frustrated trying to find what I'm looking for.

The Internet really is enshittified.

[–] Pechente@feddit.de 25 points 5 months ago

To be fair I think DDG has improved marginally over the years while Google is simply shit now. I feel like spam sites are quite prevalent on Google but less so on DDG.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Is it a viable alternative? How is it going?

[–] Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I’ve been using it for years at this point, and I really prefer it to google. For most of my common/easy searches, it gets what I want pretty reliably. Occasionally I’ll have more obscure searches where I do have to switch back to Google, but honestly Google feels less and less helpful for that as time goes on. To add, DDG has bangs which are just wonderfully handy. Turning your search into a google search is as simple as adding “!g” to your query, and it’ll redirect the search. There are tons of other ones too, it’s a really nice feature that makes DDG more convenient in a lot of cases. Very much worth trying out at least

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 months ago

I've been using duck duck go for months now. It's totally cromulent in my opinion!

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s really good these days. Kagi is still the beat, but if you want free, DDG is the way to go.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'll have to give this kagi a shot I never heard of it! DDG just doesn't ever seem give me what I want and I've been trying it forever. It's like I'm always playing this cat and mouse game with the search engine and it just gives me alllllmost what I want but not quite.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

Same, but lately Bing fucked with their pricing, and now the search results are usually garbage. I have to go re-search the query in Google way too often.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 67 points 5 months ago (2 children)

this is wrong, because today you won't find the thing you're looking for at all. Just 100 results where one word of your 5 word query vaguely matches.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 56 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And then you notice that your search term was “corrected” to something completely different. Looking at you too, Amazon.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

Fuuuuuuuck Amazon is even worse, if that's possible. You used to be able to search for a product and would get that as the first result or at least on the first page. Now, they just return shit that is vaguely related but is a paid sponsor or someone manipulating their search algorithms.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's disgusting that Google will happily make money from scammers while completely aware of what's going on

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I rarely trust top results from google, since I'm uncertain if I somehow missed the tiny gray text saying that it's an add.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 40 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Stop using Google.

And Microsoft. And Apple. And Amazon. And every single corporation that cares more about money and stealing people's privacy than serving you.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

...like AMD and Intel and nVidia and ARM and Apple and Qualcomm?

Oh wait.

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 months ago

Yep!

It's all trash these days. We're having to just avoid the worst of it while preparing for the rest of it to also suck so bad that we have to find even more alternatives, and then just throw our computers away at the end or at least go back to computing where it wasn't all about stealing data, long, long ago.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I get where you're coming from, but I also feel like I might get kind of bored and I wonder how I'm going to get that hot sauce from Alabama that I like. I'll give up on a lot of my ideals and trade a LOT of frustration for artisanal hot sauces.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm honestly amazed no one's sued google over the site telling them things like "Jump off a bridge if you're depressed" or that products have been recalled that haven't

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 17 points 5 months ago

Likely settled out of court silently with an NDA

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago

by using uBlock Origin, uBlacklist, and then something other than Google.

[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 7 points 5 months ago

For the unaware, this is a scifi term which describe humans overthrowing robot overlords.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

&udm=14 is a temporary fix for those who still feel the need to use Google's search.

Paid search isn't the solution, as evidenced by the untrustworthiness of the CEO of Kagi search.

What I would like to see is a non-profit search.

Google wanted to organize all the world's information to make it useful. Sounds like a great idea destroyed by a profit motive getting in the middle. Try the same idea without the profit motive and you'll probably end up creating something people will defend endlessly, like Wikipedia.

What if your search engine asked you for a five dollar donation, once a year, the way Wikipedia does?

Search engines should be non-profit, honestly, they should be an extension of Public Libraries.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I haven't kept up on this controversy, but is this really all there is to it? People think the service is untrustworthy because the CEO tried a bit too hard to convince a critical blogger, according to the comments possibly due to neurodivergence?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean to tell me that I keep scrolling I'll eventually get to the yellow promised land?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just one more "o", maybe it will be there...

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago

that's what she said

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 months ago

This started to become noticeable years ago when Google decided to start censoring searches even with SafeSearch off.

I switched to Bing at that time, which was good for a while, but eventually they have started doing the same thing.

I can now no longer find a search engine that actually works to find me all the relevant results. I've tried all that I've heard of, and none will provide complete results.

The easiest canary in the coal mine for this is NSFW stuff. If I search for a popular character of which I know there's lots of porn/hentai, with SafeSearch off, and do not get a heavy mix of SFW and NSFW results, I know that search engine is messing with those results, and is also definitely doing it with searches that are not so obvious.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Same with visiting almost any website.

Then

  1. Click on link to website.
  2. Read website.

Now

  1. Click on link to website.
  2. Click on Cookie options.
  3. Scroll down looking for 'Reject All'.
  4. Discover there is no 'Reject All'.
  5. Scroll back through list turning off all optional cookies.
  6. Scroll back to the bottom to click on 'Confirm my choices'.
  7. Hunt for the close X on the 'Subscribe to our newsletter' pop-up.
  8. Click on the close X on the 'Subscribe to our newsletter' pop-up.
  9. Read the website.
  10. Discover the website is just more AI generated SEO garbage.
  11. Go outside, walk on the grass barefoot, weep for the future of humanity.
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 5 months ago

That's the neat part, you don't.

The top results have been useless spam for a decade or more at this point, and the only difference is Google sit there hoovering up the money instead. The money is in the way of search. Any popular search engine will end up the same way.

It's a shite situation, but until somebody makes a non-profit search engine and filters out spammy results, we'll continue to Google, scroll down two pages for a reddit link, and carry on.

[–] joeljuca 12 points 5 months ago

I'm currently prioritizing DuckDuckGo over Google and others for a better quality of search results. There ain't much ads to mess your attention, and the results are quite good most of the time.

[–] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 10 points 5 months ago

If you need to use Google, I'd recommend the &udm=14 trick, as demonstrated on the linked site. It goes straight to a "web only" filter for search results. There are some tricks and tips to set that to your default search option in settings, or you can get a browser extension.

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

kagi.com for me has been more than worth it for the price with unlimited searches.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Try out the searxng browser plugin. It pretty much takes you back to the first pane.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It's an extremely bold assumption to make to presume that we even could? Like Ukraine wanting to not be invaded, or Rome wanting to not fall, or someone wanting to not die of cancer, or perhaps the best analogy: never exercising a day in our lives + eating however we feel like in the moment, yet wanting to not suffer the negative consequences of obesity, hardened arteries, etc.

I take the approach of the stoics: we brought this upon ourselves, allowing ourselves to be tricked by the "Don't be evil" slogan. I do not own Google - I have no stocks in the corporation, they are not running their server code on my machines, they use none of my electricity, I do not own the land they park their buildings upon, etc. - and therefore I have no call in how they choose to go about their business. They chose to enshittify, and I am not offered a say in their choices. Therefore "we" cannot "fix" this. Only they could, and only if they want.

But maybe we can build our own LLMs so that we never need to use Google to search for anything ever again, directly? For now, I use DuckDuckGo whenever I can, Google when I have to, and perhaps most important go directly to the site that I want if possible - e.g. wikipedia, wiktionary, stackoverflow, Reddit if I absolutely must, etc. We lived in a golden era of prosperity when we were allowed to "have things", but that is over - we did not take care of it properly, and it was taken over from the inside, as it was always going to be, our delusions to the contrary notwithstanding. Now, maybe we can be more realistic about our expectations moving forward.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was (trying to) use AI to help me with something on my PC a few nights ago. It was telling me to go menus and choose options that literally don't exist.

Wtf is going on with AI right now? About a year ago, I found it useful for certain things. But it seems to have totally shit itself recently, and is pretty much useless now.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Models got downgraded because they were too popular/expensive to run.

Also layers of guardrails reduce inputs and output usefulness.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Any way people could just remake 'old Google' that solely focuses on search and nothing else?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Part of the issue isn't just that they added garbage, it's that sites got better at targeting the algorithm. It's like recipe websites that started to add stories because the algorithm prioritized that. No one was asking for it, but the algorithm was broken in unexpected ways and exploited.

So, someone could make a new search engine with a different algorithm. If it becomes successful though, it's only a matter of time before it becomes targeted and manipulated.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Been like this for years now, I jumped ship 4 years ago to DuckDuckGo, might even jump that ship if it gets any worse, but alternatives...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SportsRulesOpinions@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I just subscribed to Kagi to try it out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›