this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
444 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

10950 readers
2488 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 83 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

His name was Ignaz Semmelweis, and they threw him in a mental institution. He was trying to get doctors to wash their hands in between handling corpses and doing surgery, and they got super offended about it.

Edit: I AM LYING! Partly. Semmelweis discovered illnesses caused by bacteria, but he didn't understand that they were caused by microbes, or the mechanism at work. He just was able to piece enough of it together to test empirically that if the doctors washed their hands, then people didn't get sick in the same way that they did if the hands had corpse-goo on them. Linking him to specifically understanding that tiny little creatures were everywhere was a little bit misleading thing for me to do.

Also, they were usually delivering babies, not doing "surgery" in the modern sense of opening people up and poking around in them.

The rest of what I said is true.

[–] NecroParagon@lemm.ee 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"A gentleman's hands could never be dirty!"

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He made them scrub with bleach water until he couldn't smell corpse smell anymore.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wait. For real? They had so much bacteria on their hands that they smelled of the dead, and they were going right into surgery with live humans? Damn, surgery must have been a death sentence back then.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 4 points 4 months ago

Not just surgery, but they were also working in labor and delivery, so they were getting all that on mothers and their newborn babies.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

They were practicing surgery on cadavers between deliveries. Gotta keep your skills up during your stint in maternity

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

yeah, the idea didn't take off until the previous generation of doctors died. it's a fact that often both encourages and discourages me.

even doctors were too stubborn to accept they may have been wrong about something so important, no matter the evidence. however, even those that are so stubborn that they'll take it to the grave will eventually be passed up by a new generation who has known of this idea since before they were born. at worst, this kind of stubbornnes is only likely to stall progress for 2 generations.

still, millions of people died because humans are stubborn.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 9 points 4 months ago

That is the TL;DR of Thomas Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific Revolutions." It is almost universal that when a new way of looking at the world comes along, very few people are persuaded to adopt it on an individual level. The consensus view generally stays the same until enough scientists who grew up with the old model die, that the ones remaining are outnumbered by new scientists who grew up with the new model.

It is bleakly comic, and there is surely some sort of productive lesson there, but I don't know what it is.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I’m hopeful this will be how we solve racism and intolerance… hopefully as enough people are brought up the right way, we will eventually move past the hatred in the world today.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek was the first person to observe microbes. Semmelweis deserves immense credit for trying to convince people to wash their hands, but he didn't observe microbes and believed in corpse particles. (⌐■_■)

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah. I was telling a fib for comedic effect. Semmelweis is actually a lot more impressive, to me, because he was able to deduce that something important was going on and what the solution was, without having any idea what the mechanism might be, simply from observing and following the data. He didn't need to know the details to know it was a problem; he just trusted the evidence without needing to have a narrative built up in his head to attach it to.

Also, once he realized it was killing people, he wouldn't shut up about it until they literally had to kill him to make him stop. That puts him over the line from good scientist to hero, to me.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not arguing with that, but clearly people seem to believe you and think he discovered microbes, which he didn't. The truth is more impressive anyways, no?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I edited it to add a correction. I shouldn't fib for the sake of making a more entertaining link to the posting, maybe.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Cheers, comrade.

[–] Lizardking27@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe strikethrough the first part where you credit semmelweis with the discovery. And no, a convenient lie is never better than a complicated truth. It may seem harmless to you but you've just created misinformation and disseminated it to the public.

[–] amio@kbin.run 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Semmelweiss. His radical idea of "surgeons ought to wash their hands" saw him widely ridiculed and reduced to poverty, and he died in an institution.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 10 points 4 months ago

Semmelweis discovered that a particular type of infection was much less likely to occur when doctors washed their hands with chlorinated lime water between doing an autopsy and examining a patient. However he did not know why or how this worked, and did not discover microorganisms (which were already observed by Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek some ~180 years earlier).

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wasn’t he also kinda of a dick to people

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I knew something that everyone could do to dramatically reduce the risk of life threatening infections, and nobody listened to me, I’d be kind of a dick too.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I think it was the other way around nobody listened to him because he was a dick

[–] Lizardking27@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Semmelweis didn't discover microbes. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek first observed microbes in feces using the first microscope (the Leeuvenhoek microscope), which he also invented.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 months ago

What I love is that when Van Leeuwenhoek first saw microorganisms in his microscope he named them “animalcules”, as in animal + molecule. Isn’t that freakin cute?

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And if you believe that, then you'll believe anything... that is supported by hard evidence and deducted from those by sound logical principles.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Pfffff. Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true. Facts schmacts."

--Homer Simpson

[–] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Before Louis Pasteur's disproving of spontaneous generation, most people believed that bacteria and putrefactive organisms like maggots etc. spontaneously poofed into existence, like a video game character spawning. Pasteur suggested that maggots came from flies laying their eggs on rotting meat etc, and that bacteria were everywhere and will multiply quickly under the right conditions. A lot of people at the time thought these were crackpot ideas.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

In the Discworld books witches are much like local doctors. There's a young witch that can't convince a family to move the privy away from the garden, which is making them sick. She tries to explain there are tiny, tiny animals that are coming from the poop and that's what's making them ill. They smile politely and don't change anything.

The old witch comes along and it explains that the problem is the goblins in the outhouse and to move it far away from the garden. They happily do so.

[–] badlilbean@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

This episode of This Podcast Will Kill You actually goes into that: https://player.fm/series/series-2359894/ep-31-giardia-gerardia

There is also a transcript if you just want to read about it: https://thispodcastwillkillyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/TPWKY-Episode-31-Giardia.pdf

(Warning: they make an alcoholic beverage towards the beginning of each episode in case anyone is in recovery)

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 6 points 4 months ago

Wierd part is you can actually see it with a microscope. Anime Parallel world pharmacy made more sense then real life.

[–] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 5 points 4 months ago
[–] Aquila@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Hello, Maleficent!

[–] D61@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Imagine this guy trying to explain this discovery to people who spend days reading and responding to articles trying to calculate how many angles can fit on the head of a pin.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The angles you can fit on a pin head depend entirely on the precision you're using. Quite a few with nanoseconds of a degree. Not many with radians.

(You mistyped angels)

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

There's a part of Old Yeller dedicated to this. His uncle doesn't believe in germs because germs aren't in the Bible.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Reminds me of this work by Latour. It goes into the tremendous amount of oftentimes political labor that goes into the establishment of new scientific knowledge as paradigmatic:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pasteurization_of_France

[–] Eylrid@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Horton Hears a Who if Horton was the one saying "Boil that dust speck! Boil that dust speck!"