51
submitted 4 months ago by filoria@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] filoria@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

There's two ways to look at this:

  1. If Ukraine wasn't selecting flight paths that pass over civilians, this wouldn't have happened

  2. If Russia wasn't intercepting these missiles, this wouldn't have happened

Both of those statements are insane, so let's talk about the real problem of cluster munitions. Clusrer munitions are an absolutely disgusting weapon, and their usage basically salts the ground indefinitely because it's guaranteed that not all clusters will detonate. Cluster munitions, when intercepted, cause mass civilian casualty events because they are inherently anti-personnel weapons. Cluster munitions should not be used in populated areas. Russia drew condemnation for this in 2022 Ukraine and earlier in Georgia. Ukraine should draw condemnation for this in 2024.

The UN Convention on Cluster Munitions happened in 2010. The primary users of cluster munitions are the US (and it's allies) and Russia (who does not export them afaik). As signatories to the CCM, EU states should condemn the usage of cluster munitions by it's allies. For obvious reasons, Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia absolutely despise cluster munitions (even today, people die because of the ones dropped during the Vietnam War).

The foundations of international law should not be flouted because of geopolitical tensions. If the US and Russia want to sow the seeds of suffering and misery, let them, but letting cluster munitions proliferate is bad for humanity.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago
  1. Russia could stop invading Ukraine and they wouldn’t have to worry about Ukrainian misiles.
[-] humancrayon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

This is the correct answer.

[-] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago

The US could stop provoking Russia with its proxy puppet state.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Give Ukraine better weaponry then. The first ATACM Ukraine received were all cluster munition-types.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 4 months ago

It's a deliberate choice by the USA to send these weapons. The USA should be condemned for it.

[-] filoria@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

The US refuses to send Ukraine better ATACMS. At the end of the day, the US wants cluster munitions to proliferate because it aligns with NATO military doctrine.

[-] sfera@beehaw.org 1 points 4 months ago

I understand and agree to your point on cluster munitions. From what I understand from the article it seems that the missiles reached civilian areas either because they deviated from their course or because they were intercepted.

[-] Babs@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

I thought Crimes was supposed to be Ukrainian. Why is Ukraine using cluster munitions on their own civilians???

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They’re using them on the Russian occupiers.

They were shot down causing civilian casualties.

The missiles would never have been fired if Ukraine wasn’t invaded by Russia.

Russia can stop this at any point.

Crimea is Ukraine, not Russia.

[-] MikeOToxin@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Oh no, the leopards are hungry again!

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
51 points (93.2% liked)

World News

32282 readers
682 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS