If they were going for uncontrolled crashes they would have selected Boeing
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
90 points (94.1% liked)
Technology
60058 readers
2559 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They got a Boeing stuck to it right now. The mission may start earlier than planned...
Or the Soyuz and it's thruster fits from last year.
Technically it’s just a bunch of metal and other stuff but the thought of deorbiting the ISS makes me sad.
I wish they could send it into space so it can orbit the sun forever instead of burning up.
Good point, if they’re sending a rocket up there anyway, why not just push it away from earth rather than towards it? Is it because it’s in LEO and there’s a ton of other satellites farther out?
Much cooler (hotter?) but probably more expensive…
A LaGrange point would be nice... lots of stuff there, could prove useful in a few decades...
Question: why deorbit vs push out of orbit away from earth?
To paraphrase an answer I read elsewhere: de-orbiting would be like pushing it down from the first step of a long flight of stairs. Pushing it away from Earth would require ascending the long flight of stairs, which is much harder.
So the space dolphins can live without the fear of being hit by a big metal thing.
But actually because it would probably require less Δv
Will they save all those Thinkpads?
They'll recover them after the station breaks up in the atmosphere
I would pay damn good money for a thinkpad that has been on the ISS
Cause musk knows how build things that crash and burn
This is the best summary I could come up with:
NASA has selected SpaceX to develop a vehicle that will bring the International Space Station to a fiery end when the time comes.
On Wednesday (June 26), the agency issued a statement announcing that SpaceX has been selected to develop and deliver the "U.S. Deorbit Vehicle" as it's known.
The vehicle will be responsible for disposing of the space station "in a controlled manner after the end of its operational life in 2030," the statement adds.
"The orbital laboratory remains a blueprint for science, exploration, and partnerships in space for the benefit of all," Bowersox added.
"There's nothing magical that happens in 2030," Steve Stich, manager of NASA"s commercial crew program at Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston, said during a Jan. 25, 2024 briefing.
Stich added that the ISS will continue operations until commercial space stations are in orbit and ready for crews.
The original article contains 467 words, the summary contains 143 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Well, for 20 years we had one space station and now with China we have two and if we eventually start to get commercial stations then we'll start to have even more so more people will be able to go up.
They leave the Boeing and Soyuz up there, then when it's time, gas 'em up and have them act as controlled thrusters. Everything burns up in the atmosphere. All problems solved.
Saves them $800M and change.
Yeah simple. It's not like it's rocket science.
I can't wait for the headline about his SpaceX miscalculated, rammed the station, and initiated a Kessler cascade, obliterating the infrastructure needed for international logistics and communications. Get ready for the sequel to the 1970s everybody!
Should have went with Boeing they seem to good at diorbiting stuff.