this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
228 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39032 readers
3433 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

China Evergrande Group last traded on the Hong Kong exchange on March 18, 2022 at 1.65 Hong Kong dollars ($0.13) per share, before being suspended on March 21.

The company also posted a loss of 39.25 billion yuan ($5.38 billion) for the six months ended June, with total liabilities of 2.39 trillion yuan.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

It's all a huge scam. They've been held together by the CCP for years only it's now on public display just how much of a joke this is.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

China is a funny place.. they tend to just copy what they see on Western media.. in this case they all watched Too Big To Fail, and decided it looked like a lot of fun.. so they did that on a China sized scale, and the mess this causes is going to make 2008 look like an oyster fart..

[–] ElegantBiscuit@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The difference between this and 08 though is that in 08, way too many people were allowed to buy houses that were already built, taking on debt they could not handle, and speculating to an insane degree on the health of those mortgages. A structural issue with no structural cure except to bail out individual homeowners who took on way too much debt which was never gonna happen. For evergrande (as I understand it) it’s just the property developer running out of cash to pay for the construction. The homes were already paid for, so at most the house buyers will just be either SOL or directly bailed out by the government for which there is a strong case to do so, and evergrande shareholders losing their investment is not really a big deal since they’ll probably be paid out in the bankruptcy. I feel like this whole thing is a really big parallel to Silicon Valley bank, for which all the doomers were out there peddling the impending collapse of the financial system which never happened.

If anything is gonna bring down China it will be their demographic collapse, and that is impossible to fix and already manifesting. There is of course the usual argument of a huge tax base suddenly becoming a budget liability with a significantly smaller population of people to financially support them. But the big thing that will hit the private sector is the lower population causing rising labor costs which is driving away manufacturing, and the bulk of their entire industrial infrastructure is now set up for something they will no longer be very competitive in, and for a sector which young educated urban people don’t really want to work in.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Aren't they getting rocked by typhoons right now? How come I have only seen like one AP reference about it, kind of weird.

Sorry... that was a huge tangent lol

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perfect time to buy in the for bounce 😂 /s

[–] AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You joke, but when this all started to unravel two years ago, it actually did bounce. Not much, but it did. Was clear as day it's going bankrupt, but then CCP stepped in and it all simply stopped.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Investors are almost all a highly regarded lot.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Evergrande represents most of the working class savings for China as well, as if you ever have money to invest you buy real estate in China.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, but you're not buying real estate.

The government owns it, you're buying a 99 year lease (at best) that the government might revoke at any time for any reason (such as they feel like it).

There is nowhere in china to safely invest money, that's the point of china.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The quibbling detail does not change the larger macroeconomic picture.

If you're in China the stock market is incredibly volatile. Buying property is the "safe bet" so everyone does it, often saving aggressively to buy.

80% of urban households own, 20% own a second home as well.

It doesn't matter what the legal details are, in a broad sense the multi trillion dollar real estate industry going broke in a country that only invests in real estate is everyone's problem.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but 2 points:

1: the stock market is completely fictitious which is why it is so volatile.

2: only poors invest in chinese real estate, anyone with any real money invests in foreign real estate

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Evergrande? What do they do?

[–] nomecks@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Take deposits for housing and use it to solicit more deposits for housing, without actually building any useable housing.

[–] Cheers@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just to add, they did start building, but they just started building as construction costs were increasing, so they ended up negative on all of their construction costs.

Construction companies famously tore down fully built buildings because evergrande couldn't afford them..

[–] nomecks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They built a pile of tofu dreg buildings that'll all fall down inside of ten years.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jhulten@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] theodewere@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

real debt, though.. ha ha..

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh my god it’s still the commercial

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 year ago

They were one of several construction companies that built a ton of buildings in China fueled by municipal and corporate debt. It works great when the local economy grows.

The Chinese economy has stopped growing at the levels to sustain the market conditions to pay back the debt. There are doubts that China could even get back to those levels of economic growth due to its aging population.

[–] Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Nothing, but they got paid for lots and lots of houses and offices. And that a problem.

[–] zepheriths@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If it was any other place it could be a good idea to look into exactly what it's assets are. However land development companies in China don't own the land, so in a debt to asset comparison they are horrible. That's every land development company in china

[–] Jocker@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Schrödinger's Stock Opening