95
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Didnt know I was enlisted! Thanks MSM!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Congratulations on completing boot camp, soldier. Go out and invest.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

To me, all this stonks nonsense is just investors with a new scam trying to supplant the investors running the old scam.

Anyway it's a good thing in that it exposes the grade-school explanation that the "stock market is a meritocracy where the best businesses/ products rise to the top" as total bullshit.

An alien looking at the stock market would assume that Tesla makes the best cars; MacDonald's the best food; and Microsoft the best software.

[-] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It's just so sad that some people are still hanging on to the GME bullshit after so long. Their ego doesn't allow them to acknowledge that they made a bad choice, and got fucked.

So instead of just walking away, they dive deeper and deeper into this echo chamber, insisting you'll make millions off some shitty retail stock just because a few people got lucky almost 4 years ago.

[-] forty2@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Just because a few people got lucky...? My dude, instead of parroting media talking points do the reading so you know what's actually keeping folks holding the stock.

[-] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

What media? What talking points? I was there when it went down, I bought the stock, my opinion is my own. They hold the stock due to a sunk cost fallacy. There's bound to be a little bit more nuance for some people but in my opinion it is a waste of time.

[-] forty2@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Talking points: That bunch of retail traders made a bad choice and ego won't allow them to bail out. That it was 'luck' for a few people a few years ago.

It may have been a bad choice for you and that's why I wonder why you posted what you did instead of your own opinion baked through your own experience. More powerful words generally come from personal experience.

I'm not here arguing with you about the stock, it being a good/bad investment isn't what I'm on about. I guess I'm more hung up on why you said what you did.

Like, what was it that compelled you to post such a banal response to this post? It's so sad that people are holding stock in a company with a ton of cash, a motivated and aligned management team, and very little debt?

Sounds like you're painting a brush and saying that any person holding Gamestop makes you sad. It's a pretty broad assertion that, honestly, feels like it has a story behind it.

[-] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

It makes me sad because they act like a god damn cult with their memes and rhetoric. They keep huffing copium and saying the stock will definitely go to the moon this time. It's illogical. It's just gambling at this point among hardcore GME redditors. I haven't looked at the reddit in at least a year, so idk what it's like now.

Makes me sad to see people fixating on some financial event from the Covid era, and deluding themselves into thinking this retail stock is gonna make them rich with no effort.

Why does it make me sad? It's the same feeling as when I see old people spending their retirement in a casino, feeding a slot machine.

[-] forty2@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Thanks for following up and sharing this; sincerely. There's not enough of this kind of emotive sharing with Gamestop. I agree that a lot of the 'movement' borders on being cult like in the blindly following kind of way.

I touch base on reddit monthly or so to keep tabs because the same thing you find sad, I find absolutely fascinating. All the dynamics at play...from shifts in sentiment, conspiracy-style interlopers, systemic corruption to the highest levels of bureaucracy, and sometimes actual information about the mechanics lubricating the movement of stocks and money.

I've been told I'm an emotionless rock though, so it might account for our differing perspectives on how people spend money.

[-] sneaky@r.nf -1 points 4 months ago

Not really agreeing or disagreeing with any of this, but I feel compelled to say I was interested in GME this time around based on what Mr. Gill stated about them now having a pile of cash on hand. Sounds like a good place to be with some potential. So I figured that was the case last time too right? I didn't really follow GME the last time this stuff went down. Makes sense they would have ended up sitting on a pile of cash then. Went back and saw how they ended up using THAT cash and waaasss not impressed. To each their own but I think that two billion is going in the toilet.

[-] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 0 points 4 months ago

Pretty sure the term savvy investor doesn't apply to dipshits who baghold meme stocks lol

[-] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The price is wrong

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
95 points (96.1% liked)

News

23276 readers
4216 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS