237
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] K7d@r.nf 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Has anyone checked on ozma?

The accounts on social media platform X have since been banned.

Ah dang, it was just focused on Twitter. Nevermind.

[-] almar_quigley@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I blocked that Russian troll awhile ago and my feed is so much better for it. There’s a couple of em that I did the same to and I haven’t missed anything.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz -2 points 4 months ago
[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

This is a good start. How about going after Russian payments to GOP politicians too?

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

So how would they manage to prosecute anyone if Russia goes in and buys shares of Truth Social (Trump Media Group) and keeps shoring up the price when Trump starts dumping shares after his moratorium runs out?

I'm trying to figure how this scam gets punished.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The U.S Justice Department said on Tuesday that it disrupted a Russian operation that used fake social media accounts enhanced by artificial intelligence to covertly spread pro-Kremlin messages in the United States and abroad.

The Justice Department secured court approval to seize two domain names and search nearly 1,000 social media accounts allegedly associated with the effort.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 16 points 4 months ago

The accounts on social media platform X have since been banned.

Figures it's Xitter.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I'm seeing another paragraph between those two now, might have been updated after you posted this but the full quote is

The U.S Justice Department said on Tuesday that it disrupted a Russian operation that used fake social media accounts enhanced by artificial intelligence to covertly spread pro-Kremlin messages in the United States and abroad.

The news comes four months before the U.S. presidential election, which security experts widely believe will be the target of both hacking and covert social media influence attempts by foreign adversaries. Senior U.S. officials have said publicly they are monitoring for schemes intended to disrupt the vote.

The Justice Department secured court approval to seize two domain names and search nearly 1,000 social media accounts allegedly associated with the effort.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I forgot to add the ellipsis. Fixed.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Fair enough, it was definitely background information that I can understand omitting, but making it clear it was omitted (especially when it's coming from a source that some users won't be able to access) is important imo

Thank you for updating!

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Ah so fox news was taken off the air for being a Russian talking piece?

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Disrupted the trump campaign u say?

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Fox News is down?

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 months ago

Like I'm gonna trust a *Bing generated article!

*The authors last name is Bing

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Mirror link for anyone stuck on the wrong side of a paywall or cookie wall or whatever Reuters' problem is - https://ghostarchive.org/archive/wUllP

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Is that why there are fewer porn bots now?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

I wonder if we'll see less traffic here

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I wonder if centrists will ever stop feigning McCarthyist paranoia as an end-run around having defensible positions.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
237 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
4543 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS