this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
232 points (100.0% liked)

196

16453 readers
1810 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

cute cat pic and funny juxtaposition, but real talk:

In the scientific context (in which the subject is speaking because they reference both physics and a place of education) one does not have "theories", because theory is the plural of theorem, and a theorem is a collection of related facts which conclusively describe, with predictive accuracy, the causes and effects of a phenomenon.

But if one does indeed wish to present one theorem or more to the scientific community, one may attempt to publish a paper - not to a college, but to a scientific journal. Then, other scientists from around the world will be able to attempt to experimentally reproduce the cause and effect relationships which your theory attempted to describe, and a consensus will form as to whether each theorem is, or is not, bunk.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not the way the term "theory" is used here. You should look up etymological fallacy.

Edit: it's not even true etymologically. The etymological plural of theorem (or rather theorema) is theoremata.

[–] poplargrove@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The singular of "theory" isnt "theorem". Its "theory", and the plural is "theories".

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

More of a hypothesis isnt it?

[–] taco_ballerina@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is an excellent video by a physicist about crackpots: https://youtu.be/11lPhMSulSU?si=ZGslcTKyp5Wxt1KE

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/11lPhMSulSU?si=ZGslcTKyp5Wxt1KE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] nick@campfyre.nickwebster.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I love her videos!

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have this kind of theories, maybe see a doctor

[–] Carion@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

Doctor he is suffering from major theory disorder, everytime he sees a object he need to know the theory behind it, he is now understanding beds.

I'm afraid he might become a scientist in the future.

Doctor please, we are a respectable family save my son from this awful destiny.

[–] Staple_Diet@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

This is a common issue in physics. If I am not mistaken there is a site dedicated to answering amateur-physicist questions, askthephysicist dot com.

[–] spacesweedkid27@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's what we call a crackhead