this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
839 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3776 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 125 points 4 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

She's asking neoliberals to step aside and let more progressives in. But neoliberals own the Democratic Party, and they will never give it up.

These diet conservatives suckle at the same billionaire teats as Republicans. They should be tossed on the same smoldering pile as other conservatives.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Well, they also owned the Republican party once, and magas/fascists took it over. That means progressives can take over the Democratic party.

No party lasts forever and these two have been way overdue. The way a new party becomes "one of the two" in the US' 2-party system is either by building up a third party from the bottom up over many years, or by taking control and transforming one of the existing two, which is much faster, as we've seen.

Technically the fascist magas started in earnest in 2008 with the Tea party movement as a backlash to Obama, not succeeding to oust Obama in 2012, and taking 8 years to get to Trump. Progressives started in 2016 as a reaction to Trump, got Trump out in 4 years, and stopped the predicted "red wave" in 2022. We're on track, let's keep it going. Don't give up.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Could but too many bitch endlessly online then don't show up to vote anyway. Or vote third party in a fptp system.

God it'd be nice if it happened though.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A grassroots progressive takeover is much more difficult than a fascist takeover though. Fascists are always in bed with the oligarchy and get the money and media support.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

It's always harder for people with morals who aren't ruthless assholes. But that doesn't mean it can't happen, just that it takes more work.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

...progressives can take over the Democratic party.

Hear, hear! It will not be given. It must be taken, aggressively. Your Tea Party example is perfect.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Sometimes you gotta learn the hard way.

She's there to agitate, influence, draw attention, and gather power.

I don't believe she really thinks her actions will change the minds of the people around her, but they're not supposed to. Her words are for the people who overhear, rather than those in power.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] finley@lemm.ee 53 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Make way

And not for nothing, this lady makes the meanest martini I’ve ever had

Listen to her

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This reads like an Elden Ring message

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Try hole, finger but

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

She should name names. We need to know who the collaborators will be.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 65 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

She doesnt know who. She responding to a blind quote from Axios that was attributed to a "senior house democrat" that said "we have resigned ourselves to a second trump term."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Will be? Are.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Democrats who believe they are insulated from reality by position or wealth can get fucked.

Seriously, to the politicians it’s just games and political maneuvering. They’ll sacrifice us to maintain their power. But eventually they’ll get taken out in a purge, too.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah. That was on my mind.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 months ago
[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Resign themselves to fascism

Thats the entire fucking party

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago

Bro do you want only republicans in the government?

load more comments
view more: next ›