this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
1249 points (99.1% liked)

News

23600 readers
3832 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 227 points 5 months ago (3 children)

This would be amazing if he can do it. At least he's promising good changes vs trump promising judgment day on day one...

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Didn't he literally say he would take vengeance on all his political opponents day one? Then the Supreme Court gave him absolute immunity?

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 32 points 5 months ago

Yes. He said both what I wrote and wanting revenge, saying he will be a dictator for one day, day one. This video has both clips, if you want to skip to 8:17 for the revenge and judgment day after that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNzzOwiebvM

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It is weird that they dicked around for 4 years on this, though.

Still, vote blue, your vassals beg you (Australian here).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 144 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just pack the goddamn court. There's ONE conservative justice on the Supreme Court who was appointed by a president who came to power having received more votes than his opponent, and that's Clarence Thomas, the man whose loyalties can be bought with a luxury vacation and whose wife aided and abetted insurrectionist traitors.

The ENTIRE conservative wing of the Supreme Court is illegitimate. Every single one of them. And you know what? Thanks to the GOP, it only takes 50 votes to approve a supreme court justice. It used to be sixty, but they changed the rules so they could more conveniently destroy America.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 115 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There needs to be a true check to the complete corruption of the supreme court.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 89 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I’m wishing he had packed the courts when he had the chance.

[–] praechaox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yep, exactly. I remember seeing many warnings in 2021-22 saying that then was the right time to pack the courts. Establishment Dems twiddled their thumbs while insisting that everyone everywhere needs to follow proper decorum and procedure. And now look what happened with the string of terrible Supreme Court decisions.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The fact that the US has to 'pack the courts' to get anything through shows how broken the system is.

Not that any other country is better but still, you'd think judges should be impartial and resistant to influence, and yet you get Clarence offering up his chocolate starfish for a vacation in a warm climate

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Plenty of countries are far 'better'.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Fuck procedure. Dems need to act instead of just talking about shit. I'm legit terrified for this next election.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_artic_one@programming.dev 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He never had the chance, Manchin was pretty outspoken about his opposition to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 80 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Only if the ranking is applied at the state level AND the national level. I'm not going to throw away my vote or my delegate's vote.

[–] stickyShift@midwest.social 49 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why not get rid of delegates altogether while we're at it?

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes please. As someone who isn't in a swing state, I would like my vote to matter.

And a popular vote means citizens in other countries could vote (Puerto Rico).

Also, prisoners should get a vote.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

And a popular vote means citizens in other countries could vote (Puerto Rico).

I just want to point out that Puerto Rico is not a separate country, it is part of the United States. The people there are US Citizens just like those in the 50 States. However, as a territory they do not have the same representation in government or federal support as a full State.

A lot of people get this wrong. Including some Border Patrol officers. They don't exactly hire the most educated for the Frontline positions, that's pretty clear from the stupid clearly wrong or illegal shit CBP ends up doing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 64 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Make every US citizen a Supreme Court justice when they turn 18. There’s nothing in the constitution that says you can’t do that. Put cases up to popular vote every year or two. Also, whatever law passed to do this would count as senate approval because who’s going to strike it down… the Supreme Court?

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There’s nothing in the constitution that says dogs can't play basketball.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This meme is great but it drives me crazy. There are certainly multiple eligibility requirements to play on a school basketball team, including age and being a registered student, which would prevent a dog from qualifying.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is hilarious. I'm sure someone with more bandwidth than me can point out a dozen reasons why this is bad, but fuck if it isn't funny and appealing.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah but what we have now is clearly bad too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully he succeeds. The court is fucked

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can't imagine how he possibly will. R is happy just the way things are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

PACK THE FUCKING COURT! You're in that office to serve the people not the fucking system. Doesn't matter anyway republicans are going to destroy everything they can get their hands on.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, why would you try to actually solve a problem instead of just applying a band-aid that the next administration can rip of again (by incresing the size of the court again)?

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 18 points 5 months ago

Every solution that works within the system would be a band-aid. The entire system is band-aids. The government set up by a group of wealthy white men almost 250 years ago for a population 130 times smaller than it is now simply does not and cannot work in today's world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (6 children)

He can't do it with a Republican House and a Senate that requires 60 votes to do anything.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No talkie talkie. Fucking do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The reforms backed by Biden would need congressional approval and the constitutional amendment would require ratification by 38 states in a process that seems nearly impossible to succeed.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why doesn't he just bypass congress and call it an official act?

[–] Bremmy@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He's a "soft" Democrat that cares about "optics" 🙄

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 40 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

inb4 the Supreme Court rules that new laws made about the Supreme Court are illegal. Why even stop there. They can simply rule that ACKTCHUALLY the US is a monarchy and Clarence Thomas is in charge of it all.

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm down to commit regicide

[–] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Become ungovernable instead, whatever that means to you. Refusing to have kids and then living as flat as possible so you can smoke weed is one example of social behavior that harms their agenda a lot more than committing suicide does.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 29 points 5 months ago (31 children)

What a nice thought, too bad Biden didn’t do anything over two years ago when it would have actually mattered.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not that it will get passed now, but if he did that 2 years ago, everyone would be saying that there isn’t any good indication these things are truly a huge issue. Now that it is out that they are taking bribes, working directly in conflicts of interests, and clearly doing things in contradiction to duty, there is a much stronger case.

Making a change with the fundamental design of the of the separation of powers will always be, nearly, impossible, and completely so without strong demonstration of why they need to be changed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Stack the fucking court Joe. I don't care if there are 500 Supreme Court Justices.

[–] shottymcb@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Requires an act of congress and elimination of the filibuster. Not possible with the current makeup of the Senate. Need more blue senators, which is hard because California gets the same number of Senators as North Dakota, which has the same population as a small apartment complex in LA.

So we need record turnout for that. Vote.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

He needs to push hard and fast.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

The most amazing ideas always come when the election draws close. But he can't implement any of them because there is no time.

Good thing Biden already fulfilled his previous election promises. Student loans are a thing of the past.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›